Soil Nailing Optimization Design of Foundation Pit Based on Response Surface of SVM Technology

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to study the soil nail optimization of foundation pit and obtain the global optimal solution, this paper establishes the predictive model of response surface by combining uniform test design(UD) and the support vector machine(SVM) technology. In order to avoid the disadvantages of large amount of calculation and low efficiency in heuristic algorithm, and to gain the optimal model of the explicitly analytical function in gradient algorithm, based on the predictive model of response surface under the constraint conditions, the foundation pit soil nailing is optimized through the application of enumerative algorithm. Through an engineering example, it is showed that is a time-saving method and don't need explicitly analytical model. Meanwhile, it can obtain the global optimal solution.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

27-30

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Liu Guobin, Wang Weidong. Foundation pit engineering handbook(second edition). Beijing: China architecture & building industry press, (2009).

Google Scholar

[2] China construction science research institute. JGJ120-2012. Technical specification for retaining and protection of building foundation excavations. Beijing: China architecture & building industry press, (2012).

Google Scholar

[3] Fang Kaitai. Uniform design and uniform design table [M]. Beijing: Science press, (1994).

Google Scholar

[4] Min Hongguang, Song Zhigang, Zhang Xuesong. Uniform test and nonparametric regression in sulfuric acid erosion concrete test application. Henan science 2010, 28(4): 452-455.

Google Scholar

[5] Song Zhigang, Song Jie, Yang Ruixin. Reliability Analysis of Compartment Fire by Improved Response Surface Method[A]. Proceedings of the eleventh international symposium on structural engineering, 2010, volume II: 1271-1276. (ISTP).

Google Scholar