Effect of Applied Current Density on the Electrodeposition of Ni on Ti Substrate

Article Preview

Abstract:

Ni coatings were successfully electrodeposited on Ti substrates using galvanostatic technique. The scanning electron micrography showed a smooth coating with a few round particles formed at current density of-1 mA/cm2, whereas the Ti surface was fully covered with round particles consisting of like-worm fibrils when applying higher current densities of-5 and-10 mA/cm2. The stability and electrocatalytic activity tests were conducted by cyclic voltammetry and potentiostatic techniques. The results indicate that Ni/Ti catalysts prepared at current densities of-5 and-10 mA/cm2 possess high active surface area and exhibit higher electrocatalytic activity performance towards methanol oxidation as compared to Ni/Ti prepared at-1 mA/cm2. It was concluded that the deposition current density has significantly influenced the formation of Ni coatings on Ti substrate which consequently affecting the performance of electro-oxidation of methanol. The Ni/Ti catalysts also have good stability for the oxidation process in alkaline solution.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

144-149

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S.A.G. Evans, J.G. Terry, N.O.V. Plank, A.J. Walton, L.M. Keane, C.J. Campbell, P. Ghazal, J.S. Beattie, T-J Su, J. Crain and A.R. Mount: Electrochem. Commun. Vol. 7 (2005), pp.125-129.

DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2004.11.014

Google Scholar

[2] J.M. Marinas, J.M. Campelo and D. Luna, in: Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, edited by L. Cerveny, Volume 7 of Electrochemistry Communications, Chapter 12, Elsevier (1986).

Google Scholar

[3] L. Tamašauskaitė-Tamašiūnaitė, A. Balčiūnaitė, A. Vaiciukevičienė, A. Selskis and V. Pakštas: J. Power Sources Vol. 208 (2012), pp.242-247.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.079

Google Scholar

[4] Q. Yi, W. Huang, X. Liu, G. Xu, Z Zhou and A Chen: Electroanal. Chem. Vol. 619-620 (2008), pp.197-205.

Google Scholar

[5] M.A. Abdel Rahim, R.M. Abdel Hameed and M.W. Khalil: J. Power Sources Vol. 134 (2004), pp.160-169.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.034

Google Scholar

[6] C.R. K Rao and M. Pushpavanam: Materials Chemistry and Physics Vol. 68 (2001), pp.62-65.

Google Scholar

[7] A. Ott, L.A. Jones and S.K. Bhargava: Electrochem. Commun. Vol. 13 (2011), pp.1248-1251.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Fleischmann, K. Korinek and D. Pletcher: Electroanal. Chem. Vol. 31 (1971), pp.39-49.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Taraszewska and G. Rosłonek: Electroanal. Chem. Vol. 364 (1994), pp.209-213.

Google Scholar

[10] A.A. El-Shafei: Electroanal. Chem. Vol. 471 (1999), pp.89-95.

Google Scholar

[11] R.N. Singh, A. Singh, D. Mishra, Anindita and P. Chartier: J. Power Sources Vol. 185 (2008), pp.776-783.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Maximovitch and G. Bronoel: Electrochim. Acta Vol. 26 (1981), pp.1331-1338.

Google Scholar