Adhesive Bonding Strength and Adhesive Penetration of Two Malaysian Medium Hardwoods

Article Preview

Abstract:

Majority of engineered wood product such as glulam, laminated veneer lumber and parallel strand lumber relies greatly on wood adhesive bonding and adhesive penetration. Determination of bonding strength and adhesive penetration of adhesive-wood could enhance effective utilization of wood as construction material. Kapur (Dryobalanops aromatica) and Kelat (Syzygium spp.) were two commercial Malaysian medium hardwoods were used in the study. Since pressure is essential during wood bonding, the purpose of the study is to determine the effect of different pressure on bonding strength and adhesive penetration. Kapur and Kelat samples were bonded using Phenol resorcinol formaldehyde (PRF) and press at three different pressures (100 psi, 200 psi and 300 psi). Shear stress of bond line and Adhesive penetration were measured. The result shows that Kapur has lower bonding strength compares to Kelat and both samples pressed with 200 psi pressure shows higher shear strength then 100 psi and 300 psi. The result of adhesive penetration shows that higher pressure applied during bonding assembly resulting in the higher adhesive penetration into the wood porous structure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

170-174

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F.A. Kamke and J. N. Lee, Adhesive penetration of wood – a review, Wood fiber Sci 39(2): 205-220.

Google Scholar

[2] C. R. Frihart and C. G. Hunt, Adhesives with Wood material bond formation and performance.

Google Scholar

[3] C. R. Frihart, Adhesive Bonding and performance testing of bonded wood products, Journal of ASTM International, vol. 2, no. 7 JAI12952 (2005).

DOI: 10.1520/jai12952

Google Scholar

[4] C. R. Frihart, Chapter 9: Wood Adhesion and Adhesives. Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites, USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison (2005).

DOI: 10.13073/0015-7473-61.1.4

Google Scholar

[5] G. Modzel, F. A. Kamke and F. D. Carlo, Comparative analysis of a wood; Adhesive bondline. Wood Sci Techno 45(1): 147-158 (2010).

DOI: 10.1007/s00226-010-0304-z

Google Scholar

[6] J. G Chandler, R. L. Brandon and C. R. Frihart, Examination of adhesive penetration in modified wood using fluorescence microscopy, ASC Spring convention and exposition (2005).

Google Scholar

[7] M. S White, G. Ifju and J. A. Johanson, Method for measuring resin penetration into wood. Forest Prod.J. 27(7): 52-54 (1977).

Google Scholar

[8] W. Gindl, A. Sretenovic, A. Vincenti, and M. Müller, Direct measurement of strain distribution along a wood bondline. Part II. Effects of adhesive penetration on strain distribution. Holzforschung, Vol. 59, pp.307-310, Walter de Gruyter (2005).

DOI: 10.1515/hf.2005.051

Google Scholar

[9] MS 758: 2001; glued laminated timber – Performance requirements and minimum production requirements (2001).

DOI: 10.3403/00568065u

Google Scholar

[10] M. Sernek, J. Resnik, and F. A. Kamke, Penetration of liquid urea-formaldehyde adhesive into beech wood. Wood Fiber Sci 31(1): 41-48.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Ahmad, Dissertation; Analysis of Calcutta Bamboo for Structural Composite Materials, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA (2000).

Google Scholar

[12] ASTM D7334-08, Standard Practice for Surface Wettability of Coatings, Substrates and Pigments by Advancing Contact Angle Measurement. (2008).

DOI: 10.1520/d7334-08

Google Scholar

[13] K. S. Gan, T. Choo, and S. C. Lim, Timber Notes, Medium Hardwoods I Timber Technology Bulletin, Timber Technology Centre (TTC), FRIM, Kepong, 52109 Kuala Lumpur No. 11, 1999 ISSN: 139−258, (1999).

Google Scholar