Research on Relationship of Residual Stress, Grinding Conditions and Workpiece Property in Engineering Ceramic Grinding Surface

Article Preview

Abstract:

Engineering ceramic are special hard and brittle materials, their surface properties are very sensitive to the state of the surface stress, the compressive residual stress can be improved part strength and surface properties in a certain extent, especially can increase breaking strength, tensile residual stress in the opposite role. The choice of grinding parameters and grinding temperature have great influence on the residual stress. improving grinding conditions can improve the surface properties, within a certain range, increasing grinding depth and reducing grinding temperature are advantageous to produce the beneficial compressive residual stresses on the surface properties.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 753-755)

Pages:

306-309

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Edwin R. Fuller. Theory of Fatigue for Britlle Flaws Originating From Residual Stress Concentrations.J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 2010, 66(5): 314—319.

Google Scholar

[2] Kirchner H P. Residual Stresses in Hot-Pressed Si3N4 Grooved by Single-Point Grinding.J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 2002, 65(1): 55—60.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb09923.x

Google Scholar

[3] Xinli Tian, Junfei Yang, Chao Liu, etal. Study of engineering ceramic machining with a new design of ripple controlled microdetonation of electrode arc striking. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Jul2010, Vol. 48.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-009-2289-z

Google Scholar

[4] D. Johnson walls, et al. Residual stresses in machined ceramic surface,J. Am, ceram. Soc, 2009, 69 (1): 44—47.

Google Scholar

[5] K. u dea. Application of Fracture Mechanics in Microcutting of Engineering ceramics. Annals of the CIRP32: 81—86.

Google Scholar