Response Analysis of SRC Column Subjected to Blast Loading

Abstract:

With the characteristics of large load carrying capacity and good seismic performance, SRC are always used as important vertical components to stand load. Once destroyed, leading to serious consequences and even progressive collapse. Recently, the bombings occurred frequently, lots of buildings are destroyed as a result of explosion and bring great threat to human beings. Therefore, how to improve the structure of the explosion protection performance caused widely concern in the engineering sector. The finite element software ABAQUS is used to analyze the dynamic response of SRC column under blast loading, the response curves of the column is completely different with different column-ends constraints. Compared with one end consolidation constraints, both ends consolidation constraints can significantly reduce the vibration displacement. Appropriate to increase the stirrup and steel sections can improve the ductility of SRC columns, and the displacement amplitude and the extent of damage of column can be reduced, the performance of explosion proof can be improved. The papers research can make a reference to the future research for dynamic response analysis and explosion protection of SRC column under blast loading.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 756-759)
• Pages: 190-193
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.756-759.190
• Online since: September 2013
• Authors: Ji Ke Tan, Jin Yu Pan, Hui Yang
• Keywords: ABAQUS, Dynamic Response, Explosion Protection Performance, SRC

References

[1] Zheng Shansuo, Zeng Lei etc. Experimental research on seismic behavior of steel reinforced high strength and high performance concrete frame joints[J]. Journal of Building Structures. 2008, 29(3). 128-135.

[2] Sun Jianyun. Research on the Characteristics of SRC Columns Subjected to Blast Loading[D]. Shanghai. Tongji University. (2006).

[3] Zhang Xiuhua, Zhang Chunwei etc. Numerical Simulation on ImpactResponses and FailureModes of Steel Frame StructuralColumns Subject to Blast Loads [J]. Jo urnal o f Shenyang Jianzhu University ( Natural Science). 2009, 25(4). 656-662.

[4] R. J. Mainstone. The hazard of internal blast in buildings[J]. Building Research Establishment, 1971, 8(19): 156-161.

[5] Song L, Izzuddin BA, Elnashai AS, etc. An integrated adaptive environment for fire and explosion analysis of steel frames-part 1: analytical models[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2000, 53: 63-85.

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-974x(99)00040-1

[6] Izzuddin BA, Song L, Elnashai AS, etc. An integrated adaptive environment for fire and explosion analysis of steel frames-part 2: verification and application[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2000, 53: 87-111.

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-974x(99)00041-3

[7] Samuel Tan. Cable-based retrofit of steel building floors to prevent progressive collapse [J]. Master paper of University of California in Berkeley, 2003, 4: 37-45.

[8] Zhuang Zuo, You Xiaochuan etc. Based on ABAQUS finite element analysis and application [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2009. 239-251.

[9] Zhang Jin, Wang Qingyang et al. Parameters Verification of Concrete Damaged Plastic Model of ABAQUS [J]. Building Stucture, 2008. 38(8): 127-130.

[10] Wang Yuzhuo, Fu Chuanguo. Structural engineering analysis and example explanation of ABAQUS [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2010. 94-111.

[11] Hou Yanli. Dynamic Response of the Concrete Column under Explosive and Impact Loads [D]. Xi'an. Chang'an University. (2008).