The Effect of AS's Geographic Locations on Internet's Stability

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper analyzes how the AS's geographic locations and transmission distances affect on Internet's stability. In contrast to the traditional studies focusing on the future AS network which based on nowadays, this paper emphasizes particularly on the change of AS network's performance under the effect of the economic adjusting or the technology innovation to help make adjusting measures and to lead the technological trend. A double-deck network model of geographic hypergraph and AS network is presented to simulate the geographic locations, which is not reflected in traditional models. The simulate results of our model show that Internets stability ascends with the increase of transmission distances. However, if AS's geographic locations are random, the transmission distances has no obvious effects on Internets stability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 765-767)

Pages:

1375-1381

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M Faloutsos, P Faloutsos, C Faloutsos. On power-law relationships of the Internet topology. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 29(4): 251~262 (1999).

DOI: 10.1145/316194.316229

Google Scholar

[2] G Siganos, P Faloutsos, C Faloutsos. Power laws and the AS-level Internet topology. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 11(4): 514~524 (2003).

DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2003.815300

Google Scholar

[3] T Bu, D Towsley. On Distinguishing between Internet Power Law Topology Generators. IEEE INFOCOM, 2: 638~647(2002).

Google Scholar

[4] K Klemm, VM Eguiluz. Highly Clustered Scale-Free Networks. Physical Review E, 65(3) 036123~036128(2002).

Google Scholar

[5] Z Toroczkai, KE Bassler, Jamming is limited in scale-free systems. Nature, 428: 716~717(2004).

DOI: 10.1038/428716a

Google Scholar

[6] R Albert, H Jeong, AL Barabasi. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406: 387~482 (2000).

Google Scholar

[7] J Winick, S Jamin. Inet-3. 0: Internet topology generator. Technical report , Department of EECS, University of Michigan, (2002).

Google Scholar

[8] Albert R, Barabasi A L. Topology of evolving networks: Local events and university. Phys. Rev. E, 70: 066~108(2004).

Google Scholar

[9] A Medina, A Lakhina, I Matta, J Byers. BRITE: An approach to universal topology generation. Proceedings of MASCOTS, Washington, 346~353(2001).

DOI: 10.1109/mascot.2001.948886

Google Scholar

[10] T Bu, D Towsley. On distinguishing between Internet power law topology generators. Proceeding of INFCOCOM, New York, 2: 638~647(2002).

Google Scholar

[11] S. Zhou and R. J. Mondragon, Accurately modeling the Internet topology. Phys. Rev. E, 70: 030~50(2004).

Google Scholar

[12] S. Zhou and R. J. Mondragon. Towards modeling the Internet topology-the interactive growth model. Teletraffic science and engineering, 5: 121~130(2003).

Google Scholar

[13] ST Park, DM Pennock, CL Giles. Comparing static and dynamic measurements and models of the Internet's topology. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, 3: 1616~1627(2004).

DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2004.1354574

Google Scholar

[14] B Sagy, G Mira, W Avishai. An incremental super-linear preferential Internet topology model. Proc 5th Annual Passive and Active Measurement Workshop, LNCS 3015, 53~62(2004).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24668-8_6

Google Scholar

[15] Wang Xiaoming, L Dmitri. Wealth-Based Evolution Model for the Internet AS-Level Topology. Proceeding of INFOCOM, New York(2006).

Google Scholar

[16] B Sagy, G Mira, W Avishai. A geographic directed preferential Internet topology model. Arxiv: CS, (2005).

Google Scholar

[17] A Lakhina, JW Byers, M Crovella, I Matta. On the geographic location of Internet resources(short abstract), Proc. SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop(IMW' 02), 249~250 (2002).

DOI: 10.1145/637201.637240

Google Scholar

[18] A Lakhina, JW Byers, M Crovella, I Matta. On the geographic location of Internet resources. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 21: 934~948(2003).

DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2003.814667

Google Scholar

[19] SH Yook, H Jeong, AL Barabasi. Modeling the Internet's large-scale topology. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 9(21): 13382~13386(2002).

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.172501399

Google Scholar

[20] A Aditya, C Shuchi, K Arvind, S Srinivasan. On the Scaling of Congestion in the Internet Graph. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 34(3): 43~56(2004).

DOI: 10.1145/1031134.1031141

Google Scholar

[21] H Tangmunarunkit, J Doyle, R Govindan, S Jamin, S Shenker, W Willinger. Does AS size determine degree in AS topology. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 31(5): 7~10 (2001).

DOI: 10.1145/1037107.1037108

Google Scholar