[1]
M Faloutsos, P Faloutsos, C Faloutsos. On power-law relationships of the Internet topology. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 29(4): 251~262 (1999).
DOI: 10.1145/316194.316229
Google Scholar
[2]
G Siganos, P Faloutsos, C Faloutsos. Power laws and the AS-level Internet topology. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 11(4): 514~524 (2003).
DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2003.815300
Google Scholar
[3]
T Bu, D Towsley. On Distinguishing between Internet Power Law Topology Generators. IEEE INFOCOM, 2: 638~647(2002).
Google Scholar
[4]
K Klemm, VM Eguiluz. Highly Clustered Scale-Free Networks. Physical Review E, 65(3) 036123~036128(2002).
Google Scholar
[5]
Z Toroczkai, KE Bassler, Jamming is limited in scale-free systems. Nature, 428: 716~717(2004).
DOI: 10.1038/428716a
Google Scholar
[6]
R Albert, H Jeong, AL Barabasi. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406: 387~482 (2000).
Google Scholar
[7]
J Winick, S Jamin. Inet-3. 0: Internet topology generator. Technical report , Department of EECS, University of Michigan, (2002).
Google Scholar
[8]
Albert R, Barabasi A L. Topology of evolving networks: Local events and university. Phys. Rev. E, 70: 066~108(2004).
Google Scholar
[9]
A Medina, A Lakhina, I Matta, J Byers. BRITE: An approach to universal topology generation. Proceedings of MASCOTS, Washington, 346~353(2001).
DOI: 10.1109/mascot.2001.948886
Google Scholar
[10]
T Bu, D Towsley. On distinguishing between Internet power law topology generators. Proceeding of INFCOCOM, New York, 2: 638~647(2002).
Google Scholar
[11]
S. Zhou and R. J. Mondragon, Accurately modeling the Internet topology. Phys. Rev. E, 70: 030~50(2004).
Google Scholar
[12]
S. Zhou and R. J. Mondragon. Towards modeling the Internet topology-the interactive growth model. Teletraffic science and engineering, 5: 121~130(2003).
Google Scholar
[13]
ST Park, DM Pennock, CL Giles. Comparing static and dynamic measurements and models of the Internet's topology. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, 3: 1616~1627(2004).
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2004.1354574
Google Scholar
[14]
B Sagy, G Mira, W Avishai. An incremental super-linear preferential Internet topology model. Proc 5th Annual Passive and Active Measurement Workshop, LNCS 3015, 53~62(2004).
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24668-8_6
Google Scholar
[15]
Wang Xiaoming, L Dmitri. Wealth-Based Evolution Model for the Internet AS-Level Topology. Proceeding of INFOCOM, New York(2006).
Google Scholar
[16]
B Sagy, G Mira, W Avishai. A geographic directed preferential Internet topology model. Arxiv: CS, (2005).
Google Scholar
[17]
A Lakhina, JW Byers, M Crovella, I Matta. On the geographic location of Internet resources(short abstract), Proc. SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop(IMW' 02), 249~250 (2002).
DOI: 10.1145/637201.637240
Google Scholar
[18]
A Lakhina, JW Byers, M Crovella, I Matta. On the geographic location of Internet resources. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 21: 934~948(2003).
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2003.814667
Google Scholar
[19]
SH Yook, H Jeong, AL Barabasi. Modeling the Internet's large-scale topology. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 9(21): 13382~13386(2002).
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.172501399
Google Scholar
[20]
A Aditya, C Shuchi, K Arvind, S Srinivasan. On the Scaling of Congestion in the Internet Graph. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 34(3): 43~56(2004).
DOI: 10.1145/1031134.1031141
Google Scholar
[21]
H Tangmunarunkit, J Doyle, R Govindan, S Jamin, S Shenker, W Willinger. Does AS size determine degree in AS topology. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 31(5): 7~10 (2001).
DOI: 10.1145/1037107.1037108
Google Scholar