Structure Optimization Design for the Bed of Gear Hobbing Machine

Rong Chuang Zhang; Ao Xiang Liu; Jun Wang; Wan Shan Wang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.765-767.176

Paper Titles

Research on Factors Influencing the Flexographic Platemaking Quality
p.160

Study on Structural Complexity of Transmission Case Production Line
p.163

Research of CAPP System Based on the Solid Edge
p.167

Traction Force and Climbing Capacity Theoretical Analysis of Hydraulic In-Wheel Motor Drive System
p.171

Structure Optimization Design for the Bed of Gear Hobbing Machine
p.176

Experimental Study of the Bolted Joint Surface Contact Angle
p.181

Research on Visualization Technology of Mechanical Virtual Test System
p.185

An Investigation of Heat Transfer Characteristic of Cross Internal Helical Microfin Gravity Heat Pipe with Self-Rewetting Fluid
p.189

An Investigation of the Operating Characteristics of Gravity Heat Pipe with Cross Internal Helical Microfin under Variable Power
p.193

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 765-767Structure Optimization Design for the Bed of Gear...

Structure Optimization Design for the Bed of Gear Hobbing Machine

Abstract:

In the optimization design of the gear hobbing machine bed, the finite element model is build and the static analysis and vibration modal analysis are performed. Then sensitivity analysis is used to gain the main design parameters which influence the bed property most. Furthermore, the multi-objective optimization design of the bed is performed in ANSYS Workbench with these design parameters as the design variables. At last, after all optimum proposals are showed up, Analytic Hierarchy Process is used to determine the weighting coefficient, and the most optimal solution is found out. As a result, the dynamic and static performances of the machine bed are improved under control of the machine bed mass.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 765-767)

Pages:

176-180

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.765-767.176

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Rong Chuang Zhang, Ao Xiang Liu, Jun Wang, Wan Shan Wang

Keywords:

Analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP), Finite Element Method (FEM), Gear Hobbing Bed, Optimization Design, Sensitivity Analysis

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] JIANG Heng, GUAN Yisheng, QIU Zhicheng, ZHANG Xianmin, CHEN Zhong and XU Guan; Dynamic and Static Multi-objective Optimization of a Vertical Machining Center Based on Response Surface Method; Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 47(6): 125-133.

DOI: 10.3901/jme.2011.11.125

Google Scholar

[2] G. Bianchi, F. Paolucci, P. V. Braembusshe, H. V. Brussel, and F. Jovane, Towards Virtual Engineering in Machine Tool Design, Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp.381-384, (1996).

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)63085-6

Google Scholar

[3] ZHANG Jianrun, LU Xi, SUN Qinghong, et al. Dynamic optimization design of 5 axis numerical control gantry machining center[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2005, 16(21): 1949-(1953).

Google Scholar

[4] HUO D, CHENG K, WARDLE F. A holistic integrated dynamic design and modeling approach applied to the development of ultra-precision micro-milling machines[J]; Int. Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2010 (50): 335-343.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.10.009

Google Scholar

[5] Haug.E. J, Choi.K. K, Komkov.V. Design sensitivity analysis of structural systems[M]; Academic Press, Orlando, FL. (1986).

Google Scholar

[6] SONG Shufang, LU Zhenzhou. Structural reliability sensitivity analysis method based markov chain monte carlo subset simulation[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 45(4): 33-38.

DOI: 10.3901/jme.2009.04.033

Google Scholar

[7] Luo Hui, Chen Weifang, Ye Wenhua. Sensitivity Analysis and Multi-objective Optimization Design of a Machine Column; Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2009, 28(4): 487-491.

Google Scholar