Research on the Relationship between Behavior Idiosyncrasies of Independent Director and Corporation Performance

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper analyzes the relationship between behavior idiosyncrasies of independent director and corporation performance. The research indicates that attendance meeting times of independent director and the supervision proposal have great positive impact on corporation performance, but strategic proposal has negative influence on corporation performance. And the quantity of proposal has certain positive relationship between corporation performance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 765-767)

Pages:

3258-3261

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Qi Gu, Dongzhi Yu, corporate governance, board behavior and operation performance[J]. financial issue study, 2001, (2). (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Yifeng Shen, Junsheng Zhang, the study on board governance failure of STlisted company, 2002, security market guide, issue 3. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Yongxiang Sun, Rong Zhang, board size, corporate governance and performance [J] enterprise economy, 2000. (10) (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Yuetang Wang, Ziye Zhao Xiaoye Wei, Whether the independence of board will influence corporation performance [J], Economy Research, 2006(6). (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Dongzhi Yu, board, corporate governance and corporation performance[J]. China social science, financial issue study, 2003, (3). (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] Dongzhi Yu, Guohua Chi, board size, stability and corporation performance[J]. economy research 2004, (4). (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Denis, David J. and Sarin, Atulya. Ownership and board structures in publicly traded corporations [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1999, 52 (2): 187-224.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-405x(99)00008-2

Google Scholar

[8] Eisenberg, T., S., Sundgren, M. W. Larger Board Size and Decreasing Firm Value in Small Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 1998, (48): 35-54.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-405x(98)00003-8

Google Scholar

[9] Ocasio. Political Dynamics and Circulation of Power: CEO Succession in U.S. Industrial Corporations, 1960-1990, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994, 39, 291.

DOI: 10.2307/2393237

Google Scholar

[10] Daqing Qi, Woody Wu and Hua Zhang. Shareholding structure and corporate performance of partially privatized firms: Evidence from listed Chinese companies, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 2000, 8: 587-610. (In Chinese).

DOI: 10.1016/s0927-538x(00)00013-5

Google Scholar