Assessment of Life Cycle Energy Consumption and Emissions for Conventional and Advanced Powertrain Vehicles

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, an environmental comparison of hybrid, fuel cell and gasoline passenger vehicles is performed with the application of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Unlike in a classic LCA, the vehicle cycle and fuel cycle of vehicles have both been modeled to cover vehicles with the full life time.According to the assumptions, the total energy consumption of the hybrid and fuel cell vehicles are respectively 27% and 37% lower than that of the gasoline vehicle. The GHG emission of the hybrid and fuel cell vehicles are respectively 27% and 44% lower than that of the gasoline vehicle. The results of the study show that the FCV is the one that presents the lower LCA energy consumption and GHG emission compared with the HEV.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

244-249

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Roman L. Petrov: Original method for car life cycle assessment (LCA) and its application to LADA cars, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, SAE 2007-01-1607.

DOI: 10.4271/2007-01-1607

Google Scholar

[2] H. Schoech, H. Florin, J. Kreissig and P. Eyerer: LCA based design for environment in the automotive industry, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, SAE 2000-01-1517.

DOI: 10.4271/2000-01-1517

Google Scholar

[3] ISO 14040: 2006. Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework, International standard ISO 14040, Geneva, Switzerland, (2006).

DOI: 10.1065/lca2005.03.001

Google Scholar

[4] ISO 14044: 2006. Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Requirements and Guidelines. International Standard ISO 14044, Geneva, Switzerland, (2006).

DOI: 10.3403/30290345

Google Scholar

[5] A. Burnham, M. Wang and Y. Wu: Development and Applications of GREET2. 7—The Transportation Vehicle-Cycle Model, Argonne National Laboratory, November (2006).

Google Scholar

[6] Shuhua Li, Nannan Li, Ying Gao, Jun Li: Vehicle Cycle Environmental Impacts Assessment of a China Passenger Car, 2012 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology (ICBEB), Macau, (2012).

DOI: 10.1109/icbeb.2012.466

Google Scholar

[7] Houghton JT, Filho LGM, Bruce J, et al. in: Radiative forcing of climate change and an evaluation of the IPCC IS92 emissions scenarios, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; (1994).

Google Scholar

[8] The ministry of commerce of China: Motor vehicle mandatory retirement standard and provision, Beijing, China, 2012. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Marianne Leuenberger, Rolf Frischknecht: Life Cycle Assessment of Battery Electric Vehicles and Concept Cars, BEV_ecoinvent_report, June (2010).

Google Scholar

[10] Andrea Caizzi, Pierpaolo Girardi, Comparative LCA of electric mopeds versus internal combustion mopeds, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, SAE 2001-01-3291.

DOI: 10.4271/2001-01-3291

Google Scholar

[11] Cheng Zhang, Gengqiang Pu, Chengtao Wang: Machine design and research, vol. 19, NO. 4, 2003. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar