Analysis of NPD Performance Based on a Meta-Analysis and Structural Equations Modeling Examination

Article Preview

Abstract:

The structure dimensions and the interactions of new product development performance have stimulated debate lasting many years. To synthesize accumulating research findings, meta-analytic structural equation modeling was employed. Product advantage, time efficiency, cost efficiency and product success were used to measure the performance based on past literature. The correlation matrix of four performance variables was included in the meta-analysis based on 44 studies. The results of structural equations modeling show that the one-factor model is proposed as best-fitting alternative model of NPD performance, and the internal performance including product advantage, time and cost efficiency variables are positively associated with external performance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 774-776)

Pages:

2017-2020

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Griffin, A., Page, A. PDMA success measurement project: recommended measures for product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management. Vol. 13 (1996), pp.478-496.

DOI: 10.1111/1540-5885.1360478

Google Scholar

[2] Huang, X., Soutar, G.N., Brown, A. Measuring new product success: an empirical investigation of Australian SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management. Vol. 33 (2004), p.117–123.

DOI: 10.1016/s0019-8501(03)00034-8

Google Scholar

[3] García N, Sanzo M J, Trespalacios J A. New product internal performance and market performance: evidence from Spanish firms regarding the role of trust, interfunctional integration, and innovation type. Technovation. Vol. 28, (2008), pp.713-725.

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.01.001

Google Scholar

[4] Mallick, D.N., Schroeder, R.G. An integrated framework for measuring product development performance in high technology industries. Production & Operations Management. Vol. 14 (2005), p.142–158.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00015.x

Google Scholar

[5] Shankar, V. New product introduction and incumbent response strategies: their interrelationship and the role of multimarket contact. Journal of Marketing Research. Vol. 36 (1999), p.327–344.

DOI: 10.1177/002224379903600303

Google Scholar

[6] Cheung, M. W. L., & Chan, W. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. Psychological Methods. Vol. 10 (2005), p.40–64.

DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.10.1.40

Google Scholar

[7] Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical Method for Meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press (1985).

Google Scholar

[8] Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed. ). New York, NY: Academic Press(1988).

Google Scholar