In-Plane Assessment of Existing Timber Diaphragms in URM Buildings via Quasi-Static and Dynamic In Situ Tests

Article Preview

Abstract:

Mechanical and dynamic in-plane properties of timber diaphragms are known to be key parameters when determining both the local and global seismic response of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings. However, few data pertaining to experimental campaigns on this issue are available in the literature, especially regarding existing floors. In this work, the outcomes of a field testing campaign on full-scale old timber diaphragms are presented. Two specimens, whose size was 5.6 x 9.6 m2 and 4.7 x 9.6 m2 were obtained from a 17 x 9.6 m2 floor and were subjected to a series of both cyclic and snap back tests in the direction orthogonal to the joists. Since the original anchoring system was deficient, new epoxy-grouted anchors were installed before starting the testing procedure. So as to reproduce the inertial load distribution, an ad hoc loading system was developed by means of wire ropes and steel pulleys. After testing the diaphragms in the as-built condition, the effect of different refurbishment techniques was also investigated. From the results, it seems that even simple and cost-effective solutions such as the re-nailing of the flooring are sufficient to achieve a significant increase in the equivalent shear stiffness.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

495-502

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Piazza, C. Baldessari, R. Tomasi, The role of in-plane floor stiffness in the seismic behaviour of traditional buildings. In: Proceeding of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China. October 12-17, (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] A. Brignola, S. Pampanin, S. Podestà, Experimental Evaluation of the In-Plane Stiffness of Timber Diaphragms. Earthquake Spectra: November 2012, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp.1687-1709.

DOI: 10.1193/1.4000088

Google Scholar

[3] A. Wilson, P. J. H. Quenneville, J. M. Ingham, In-plane orthotropic behavior of timber floor diaphragms in unreinforced masonry buildings, Journal of Structural Engineering, doi: 10. 1061/(ASCE)ST. 1943-541X. 0000819, (2013).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000819

Google Scholar

[4] FEMA  356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers and Federal Emergency Management Agency, Reston, VA. (2000).

Google Scholar

[5] AS/NZS 2269: 2008, Structural Plywood, Australian/New Zealand Standard. (2008).

Google Scholar

[6] H. Derakhshan, Seismic Assessment of Out-of-Plane Loaded Unreinforced Masonry Walls, PhD Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Auckland, New Zealand. (2011).

Google Scholar

[7] Agbabian & Associates, S.B. Barnes & Associates, and Kariotis & Associates, (ABK) A Joint Venture; Methodology for mitigation of seismic hazards in existing unreinforced masonry buildings: Interpretation of diaphragm tests, Rep. No. ABK-TR-05 (draft), El Segundo, California. (1982).

DOI: 10.2172/6525675

Google Scholar

[8] NZSEE, Assessment and Improvement of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings for Earthquake Resistance, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Wellington, New Zealand. (2011).

Google Scholar

[9] ASCE-SEI 41/06, Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va. (2007).

DOI: 10.1061/9780784408841.err

Google Scholar

[10] S. Beskhyroun, Graphical Interface Toolbox for Modal Analysis, Proceedings of the Ninth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Building an Earthquake-Resilient Society 14-16 April 2011, Auckland, New Zealand.

Google Scholar