High Coverage ZnO Nanorods on ITO Substrates via Modified Chemical Bath Deposition (CBD) Method at Low Temperature

Amalia Sholehah; A.H. Yuwono; Nji Raden Poespawati; Adithya Trenggono; Fajrika Maulidiah

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.789.151

Paper Titles

Synthesis of Mesoporous Silica from Tetraethylorthosilicate by Using Sodium Ricinoleic as a Template and 3-Aminopropyltrimethoxysilane as Co-Structure Directing Agent with Volume Variation of Hydrochloric Acid 0.1 M
p.124

Optimizing the Nanostructural Characteristics of Chemical Bath Deposition Derived ZnO Nanorods by Post-Hydrothermal Treatments
p.132

Effect of CaO Dopant on the Dielectric Properties of NiO
p.138

Numerical Modeling of Ship Composite-Based on Aluminum Casting as Alternative Materials for Ship Building
p.143

High Coverage ZnO Nanorods on ITO Substrates via Modified Chemical Bath Deposition (CBD) Method at Low Temperature
p.151

Quantum Approximation for Josephson's Tunneling in Th_x DUO₂ Nano Material for 535 Tesla at Muon Cyclotron
p.157

Microstructural Characterisation and Microwave Absorption Characteristics of La_(1-x)Ba_xFe_0.25Mn_0.5Ti_0.25O₃ (x = 0, 0.25, 0.75, 1)
p.161

Performance of Natural Carotenoids from Musa aromatica and Citrus medica var Lemon as Photosensitizers for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells with TiO₂ Nanoparticle
p.167

Synthesis and Characterization of Nanocrystalline TiO₂ by Non-Aqueous Sol-Gel in Acidic Condition for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells
p.171

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 789High Coverage ZnO Nanorods on ITO Substrates via...

High Coverage ZnO Nanorods on ITO Substrates via Modified Chemical Bath Deposition (CBD) Method at Low Temperature

Abstract:

In the present work, ZnO nanorods array were successfully grown on ITO substrate via chemical bath deposition method (CBD). The seeding solution was prepared at low temperature (0°C) using zinc nitrate tetrahydrate and hexamethylenetetramine. The as-deposited ZnO nanorods were hexagonal wurtzite structure growing vertically on the substrate. Various reaction times from 3 to 5 hours were applied upon the CBD process at 90°C. The results showed that the duration of reaction time has affected the nanorods array properties. With the increase of reaction time from 3 to 5 hours has increased the diameter and crystallite size of nanorods from 325 to 583 nm, and from 22.68 to 34.28 nm. As a result, the band gap energy, E_g of ZnO nanorods decreased from 3.63 to 3.13 eV.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Materials, Processing and Manufacturing

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 789)

Pages:

151-156

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.789.151

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Amalia Sholehah, A.H. Yuwono, Nji Raden Poespawati, Adithya Trenggono, Fajrika Maulidiah

Keywords:

Chemical Bath Deposition (CBD), Growing Solution, High Coverage, Low-Temperature, ZnO Nanorod

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] V. Anh, L. Anh, T. Quang, V. Ngoc and N. Van Quy: Appl. Surf. Sci. Vol. 265 (2013), p.458.

Google Scholar

[2] R. Shabannia: Mater. Lett. Vol. 90 (2013), p.156.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Chung, J. Lee and S. Lim: Physica B Vol. 405, no. 11 (2010), p.2593.

Google Scholar

[4] G. Zhong, A. Kalam, A. S. Al-shihri, Q. Su, J. Li and G. Du: Mater. Res. Bull. Vol. 47 No. 6 (2012), p.1467.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Lang, J. Yang, C. Li, L. Yang, Q. Han, Y. Zhang, D. Wang, M. Gao and X. Liu: Cryst. Res. Technol. Vol. 43 No. 12 (2008), p.1314.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Sholehah, A. H. Yuwono and C. R. Rimbani: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 737 (2013), p.28.

Google Scholar

[7] K. V Gurav, U. M. Patil, S. M. Pawar, J. H. Kim and C. D. Lokhande: J. Alloys Compd. Vol. 509 No. 29 (2011), p.7723.

Google Scholar

[8] L. Z. Pei, H. S. Zhao, W. Tan, H. Y. Yu, Y. W. Chen and Q. Zhang: Mater. Charact. Vol. 60 No. 9 (2009), p.1063.

Google Scholar

[9] X. Wu, H. Chen, L. Gong, F. Qu and Y. Zheng: Adv. Nat. Sci.: Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Vol. 2 No. 3 (2011), p.035006.

Google Scholar

[10] S. Wei, Q. Jiang and J. Lian: Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China Vol. 18 No. 5 (2008), p.1089.

Google Scholar

[11] B.D. Cullity: Elements of X-ray Diffraction, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley Reading, Massachusetts, (1978).

Google Scholar

[12] C. Suryanarayana, M.G. Norton, X-Ray Diffraction: A Practical Approach, Plenum Press, New York, (1998).

Google Scholar

[13] J. Tauc, R. Grigorovich and A. Vancu: Phys. Status Solidi Vol. 15 (1966), p.627.

Google Scholar

[14] A. H. Yuwono, G. Ramahdita and N. Sofyan: Adv. Matter. Res. Vols 557-559 (2012), p.119.

Google Scholar

[15] A.H. Yuwono, B. Liu, J. Xue, J. Wang, H.I. Elim, W. Ji, Y. Li and T.J. White: J. Mater. Chem., Vol. 14 (2004), p.2978.

Google Scholar

[16] A.H. Yuwono, N. Sofyan, I. Kartini, A. Ferdiansyah, and T.H. Pujianto: Adv. Mater. Res. Vol. 277 (2011), p.90.

Google Scholar

[17] A.H. Yuwono, A. Ferdiansyah, N. Sofyan, I. Kartini, and T.H. Pujianto: American Institute of Physics (AIP) Conference Proceedings Vol. 1415 (2011), p.159.

Google Scholar