Synthesis and Gas Sensing Properties of Urchin-Like CuO Self-Assembled by Nanorods through a Poly(ethylene glycol)-Assisted Hydrothermal Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Urchin-like CuO, consisting of closely packed nanorods with a diameter of 10nm, have been successfully synthesized by a poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-assisted hydrothermal route at low temperature of 100°C. The as-obtained Urchin-like CuO were thoroughly characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) study, Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM), High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and Gas sensor measurements. From the XRD pattern, all the peaks detected can be assigned to CuO in a monoclinic structure with lattice parameters a=4.662, b=3.416 and c=5.118 (JCPDS card no. 65-2309). The FESEM and TEM showed that the diameter of the urchin-like CuO sphere is about 1µm. Further investigation of the formation mechanism reveals that the PEG-assisted hydrothermal process is vital to the formation of 3D structures. Besides the template function, PEG often plays as a reductant while reacting with Cu(+2). In our case, no impurity peaks of Cu2O were observed in the XRD pattern, implying that PEG did not reduce Cu(+2) to Cu(+1). We attribute this to the high concentration of PEG. The sensor based on the urchin-like CuO nanostructures exhibit excellent ethanol-sensing properties at reduced working temperature (200°C), which shows a sensitivity two times higher than that of CuO particles(about 100nm, made from calcinations of Cu(NO3)2 at 400°C). The enhancement in sensitivity of the as-prepared CuO may be contributed to the fancy 3D nanostructures.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 79-82)

Pages:

1059-1062

Citation:

Online since:

August 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. T. S. Nair, L. Guerrero, O. L. Arenas and P. K. Nair: Applied Surface Science Vol. 150 (1999), p.143.

Google Scholar

[2] C. T. Hsieh, J. M. Chen, H. H. Lin and H. C. Shih: Applied Physics Letters Vol. 83 (2003), p.3383.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Ishihara, M. Higuchi, T. Takagi, M. Ito, H. Nishiguchi and T. Takita: Journal of Materials Chemistry Vol. 8 (1998), p. (2037).

Google Scholar

[4] J. B. Reitz and E. I. Solomon: Journal of the American Chemical Society Vol. 120 (1998), p.11467.

Google Scholar

[5] B. Liu and H. C. Zeng: Journal of the American Chemical Society Vol. 126 (2004), p.8124.

Google Scholar

[6] X. C. Jiang, T. Herricks and Y. N. Xia: Nano Letters Vol. 2 (2002), p.1333.

Google Scholar

[7] X. J. Zhang, G. F. Wang, X. W. Liu, J. J. Wu, M. Li, J. Gu, H. Liu and B. Fang: Journal of Physical Chemistry C Vol. 112 (2008), p.16845.

Google Scholar

[8] X. J. Zhang, G. F. Wang, W. Zhang, N. J. Hu, H. Q. Wu and B. Fang: Journal of Physical Chemistry C Vol. 112 (2008), p.8856.

Google Scholar

[9] J. J. Chen, K. Wang, L. Hartman and W. L. Zhou: Journal of Physical Chemistry C Vol. 112 (2008), p.16017.

Google Scholar

[10] X. G. Wen, W. X. Zhang and S. H. Yang: Langmuir Vol. 19 (2003), p.5898.

Google Scholar

[11] W. Z. Jia, E. Reitz, H. Sun, H. Zhang and Y. Lei: Materials Letters Vol. 63 (2009), p.519.

Google Scholar

[12] S. H. Park and H. J. Kim: Journal of the American Chemical Society Vol. 126 (2004), p.14368.

Google Scholar

[13] S. Z. Li, H. Zhang, Y. J. Ji and D. R. Yang: Nanotechnology Vol. 15 (2004), p.1428.

Google Scholar

[14] L. Z. Zhang, J. C. Yu, A. W. Xu, Q. Li, K. W. Kwong and S. H. Yu: Journal of Crystal Growth Vol. 266 (2004), p.545.

Google Scholar

[15] Y. Y. Xu, X. L. Jiao and D. R. Chen: Journal of Physical Chemistry C Vol. 112 (2008), p.16769.

Google Scholar