Influence of DC-Joule Heat on Giant Magneto-Impedance of Co-Based Melt Extraction Wires

Article Preview

Abstract:

Co68.25Fe4.5Si12.25B15 naked amorphous wires of 60μm in diameter are prepared by melt extraction technology and annealed by DC-Joule heat at current from 40mA to 250mA for 10min. Impedance response is measured at low frequencies(≤13MHz) using HP4192 impedance analyzer. We get better GMI effect by heating wires at 60mA and 180mA.The connection between GMI response and transformation of structure under different heat current has been discussed. After proper heat treatment, magneto impedance response is strong even at 0.5MHz with GMI amplitude of 193.1% and field sensitivity of 59.4%/Oe. The maximum △Z/Z reaches 476.9% and the largest field sensitivity is up to 91.8%/Oe. These results indicate proper annealed Co-based melt extraction wires are suitable for high sensitivity sensor applications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 79-82)

Pages:

1615-1618

Citation:

Online since:

August 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W. Y. Gong et al., Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 320, 1553 (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] T. K. K. Mohri, K. Kawashima, H. Yoshida and L. V. Panina, IEEE Transactions on magnetics 28, 3150 (1992).

Google Scholar

[3] M. -H. Phan, and H. -X. Peng, Progress in Materials Science 53, 323 (2008).

Google Scholar

[4] M. K. Coisson, S. N. Tiberto, P. Vinai, F., Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 271, 312 (2004).

Google Scholar

[5] M. C. s. F. Celegato, S.N. Kane, P. Tiberto, F. Vinai, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 353, 919 (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.12.060

Google Scholar

[6] A. K. P. S.K. Pal, A. Mitra, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 320, 496 (2008).

Google Scholar

[7] Z. J. Z. X. P. Lia, C. Chua, H. L. Seet, and L. Lu, Journal of Applied Physics 94, 7626 (2003).

Google Scholar

[8] M. M. T. M. Ghanaatshoar, S.M. Mohseni, M. Parhizkari, S.E. Roozmeh, A. Jazayeri Gharehbagh, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 304, e706 (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.02.193

Google Scholar

[9] L. K. K.R. Pirota!, H. ChiriacM. Knobel, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 221, L243 (2000).

Google Scholar

[10] J. Strom-Olsen, Materials Science and Engineering A178, 239 (1994).

Google Scholar

[11] L. P. D. -X. Chen, F. J. Castaño, M. Vazquez, and A. Hernando, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 37, 994 (2001).

Google Scholar

[12] I. K. P. Ciureanu, L.G.C. Melo, P. Rudkowski, A. Yelon, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 245, 305 (2002).

Google Scholar

[13] A. Z. V. Zhukova, K.L. Garcia, V. Kraposhin, A. Prokoshin, J. Gonzalez, M. Vazquez, Sensors and Actuators A 106, 225 (2003).

Google Scholar

[14] I. Z. R. Md. Kamruzzaman, M.A. Rahman, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 119, 312 (2001).

Google Scholar

[15] Q. Man, Fang, Yunzhang, Sun, Huaijun, Ye, Fangmin, in Sixth International Conference on Thin Film Physics and Applications (SPIE, 2008), pp. 69841D.

Google Scholar

[16] K. J. J. Cheol Gi Kim, and H. C. Kim, Journal of Applied Physics 85, 5447 (1999).

Google Scholar