Interface Strength and Structure of Explosive Welding Sainless Steel-Aluminum Clad

Article Preview

Abstract:

The interface is the area where two type of materials are connected, the strength and property of interface are important for the application of the clad. In this paper, interfacial strength and fracture properties of stainless steel-aluminum clad are analyzed with the methods of interfacial shear test and four point bending test, and the interfacial crack and the interfacial fracture structure are analyzed with SEM. The results show that the bonding of stainless steel and aluminum is successfully realized by explosive welding, the interfacial shear strength reach 70.90MPa, and the interfacial energy release rate is 1.725 MPa•m, the thickness of transition layer is about 10μm at the interface, the interfacial fracture happen and extend in the transition layer along the interface and the interface fracture structure is inclined to brittle fracture.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 79-82)

Pages:

1803-1806

Citation:

Online since:

August 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. He,J.C. Feng. Microstructure and strength of diffusion-bonded joints of TiAl base alloy to steel. Materials Characterization. 2002, 48: 401-406.

DOI: 10.1016/s1044-5803(02)00319-4

Google Scholar

[2] B. Serier, M. Belhouari. Numerical study of the interaction between an interfacial crack and a subinterfacial micro crack in bi-materials [J]. Computational Materials Science, 2004, 29: 309-314.

DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2003.10.008

Google Scholar

[3] Ma . Qing. A four-point bending technique for studying subcritical crack growth in thin films and at interfaces [J]. J. Mater. Res. 1997, (12): 840-845.

DOI: 10.1557/jmr.1997.0122

Google Scholar

[4] P. Lucksanasombool, W.A. J Higgs. Interfacial fracture toughness between bovine cortical bone and cements [J]. Biomaterials, 2003, 24: 1159-1166.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00464-7

Google Scholar

[5] E. Tschegg, H.O. Kirchner, M. Kocak. Cracks at the ferrite-austenite interface [J]. Acta metal meter, 1990, 38: 469-478.

DOI: 10.1016/0956-7151(90)90153-8

Google Scholar

[6] M. Yilmaz, M. Col. Interface properties of aluminum/steel friction-welded components. Materials Characterization. 2003, 49: 421-429.

DOI: 10.1016/s1044-5803(03)00051-2

Google Scholar

[7] Tschegg E, Kirchner H O, Kocak M. Cracks at the ferrite2austenite interface[J ] . Acta. Metal . Mater , 1990 , 38 : 469~478.

DOI: 10.1016/0956-7151(90)90153-8

Google Scholar

[8] F. Jiang, K. Zhao, J. Sun Evaluation of interfacial crack growth in bimaterial metallic joints loaded by symmetric three-point bending [J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2003, 80: 129-137.

DOI: 10.1016/s0308-0161(03)00004-8

Google Scholar

[9] O. Dowd N P, Stout M G and Shih C F. Fracture toughness of alumina-niobium interfaces: experiments and analyses [J]. Philosophical Magazine A, 1992, 66(6): 1037-1064.

DOI: 10.1080/01418619208248005

Google Scholar

[10] N.W. Klingbeil, J.L. Beuth. Interfacial fracture testing of deposited metal layers under four-point bending [J]. Engineering fracture mechanics, 1997, 56: 113-126.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(96)00109-9

Google Scholar

[11] Lining Xu, H.V. Tippur. Fracture parameters for interfacial cracks: an experimental-finite element study of crack tip fields and crack initiation toughness [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 1995, 71: 345-363.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00037814

Google Scholar