Comparative Analysis on Seismic Performance of Steel Frame with Different Forms of Symmetric Enhanced Nodes

Li Ting Dong; Yan Wang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.790.247

Paper Titles

Application of the CRD Method in Construction of an Ultra-Shallow, Ultra-High Section and Large-Span Mined Tunnel
p.231

The Engineering Geological Characteristics Evaluation of the Weak Soft Soil of the Xingheng Highway Test Section
p.235

Application of Superiority Evaluation Method in Engineering Bidding Evaluation
p.239

Dynamic Response Sensitivity Analysis of Asphalt Pavement to Moving Point Loads
p.243

Comparative Analysis on Seismic Performance of Steel Frame with Different Forms of Symmetric Enhanced Nodes
p.247

Innovation of Utility Tunnel Nodal Design Taking Utility Tunnel in Laiyuan as Example
p.252

Influence Analysis of the Incorrect Construction Sequence on Concrete Strength of Cast-in-Place Piles
p.255

Heat Damage of High-Temperature Rock Tunnel by Weighted Residual Method in Tibet Plateau
p.259

The Technique for Simulation of Broken Defects in Model Pile Tests
p.264

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 790Comparative Analysis on Seismic Performance of...

Comparative Analysis on Seismic Performance of Steel Frame with Different Forms of Symmetric Enhanced Nodes

Abstract:

Based on node test and finite element analysis results of four different structural form enhanced nodes,failure modes,hysteretic behavior,bearing capacity,ductility and energy dissipation capacity of nodes are analyzed comprehensively and comparatively for more in-depth exploration about the seismic performance of symmetric enhanced nodes.The results showed that all the symmetric enhanced nodes have full hysteretic curve and energy dissipation capacity. On the whole,The flange-plate reinforced node exhibit better seismic performance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 790)

Pages:

247-251

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.790.247

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Li Ting Dong, Yan Wang

Keywords:

Cyclic Loading Test, Enhanced Nodes, Finite Element Analysis (FEA), Seismic Performance, Steel Frame

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Gu qiang, Hysteretic behavior of steel structures and seismic design. China Building Industry Publishing (2009).

Google Scholar

[2] Cheol-Ho Lee, Sang-Woo Jeon. et. al. Effects of Panel Zone Strength and Beam Web Connection Method on Seismic Performance of Reduced Beam Section Steel Moment Connections. Vol. 131(12) of Journal of Structural Engineering (2005), pp.1854-1865.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1854)

Google Scholar

[3] Xiaofeng Zhang, James M. Ricles. Experimental Evaluation of Reduced Beam Section Connections to Deep Columns. Vol. 132(3)Journal of Structural Engineering(2006), pp.346-357.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2006)132:3(346)

Google Scholar

[4] Yu yousheng, Wang Yan, Experimental Study on the Mechanical Property of Reduced Beam Section Connections of Steel Frames, Vol. 26（2）engineering mechanics(2009), P168～175.

Google Scholar

[5] AISC, Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings(2005).

Google Scholar