Research on Cu(II) Transfer Using Supported Liquid Membrane

Article Preview

Abstract:

Supported liquid membrane is established by using 2-Ethylhexylphosphoric acid mono-2-ethylhexyl ester as carrier, kerosene as membrane solvent and Polyvinylidene fluoride membrane as matrix. This article analyzes the effects of Cu (II) concentration, migration time, carrier concentration and feed solution pH for the rate of migration by means of monofactor experiments to obtain the optimum experimental conditions. The results indicate that the migration rate of Cu (II) with the optimical conditions as following: Cu (II) concentration at 4×10-4mol/L, migration time at 120min, carrier concentration at 7% and feed solution pH at 5.0, attains to 83.5%, which is the optimum value of Cu (II) migration.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

41-44

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Mei Guang-quan. Harmfulness and Treatment of Heavy Metal Waste Water [J]. Studies of Trace Elements and Health, Vol. 21 (2004), Issue 4.

Google Scholar

[2] Zou Zhaohua, He Sufang, Han Caiyun, Zhang Liuyi, Luo Yongming. Progress of Heavymetal Liquid Waste Progressing Technique [J]. Technology of Water Treatment, Vol. 36 (2010), Issue 6.

Google Scholar

[3] F.J. Alguacil, F.A. Lopez, I. Garcia-Diaz. Copper removal from acidic wastewaters using 2-hydroxy-5-nonylbenzaldehyde oxime as ionophore in pseudo-emulsion membrane with strip dispersion (PEMSD) technology [J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 18 (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2011.11.034

Google Scholar

[4] Merve Zeyrek Ongun, Kadriye Ertekin, Mustafa Gocmenturk, Yavuz Ergun, Aslıhan Suslu. Copper ion sensing with fluorescent electrospun nanofibers [J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, Vol. 90 (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2012.01.042

Google Scholar

[5] Zhang Yongfeng, Xu Zhenliang. Latest developments of the treatment of heavy metal wastewater [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, Vol. 23 (2003), Issue 6.

Google Scholar

[6] Liang Shuai, Yan Dong-yun, Xu Shao-hui. Review on Microbiological and Botanical Treatment Technology for Heavy Metal Wastewater [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 32 (2009), Issue 11.

Google Scholar

[7] B. Stephen Inbaraj, J.S. Wang, J.F. Lu, F.Y. Siao, B.H. Chen. Adsorption of toxic mercury(II) by an extracellular biopolymer poly(γ-glutamic acid) [J] Bioresource Technology, Volume 100 (2009), Pages 200–207.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.014

Google Scholar

[8] K.F. Lam, H. Kassab, M. Pera-Titus, K.L. Yeung, B. Albela, L. Bonneviot. MCM-41 LUS: alumina tubular membranes for metal separation in aqueous solution [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Vol. 115 (2011), Issue 1, Pages 176–187.

DOI: 10.1021/jp1065874

Google Scholar

[9] Du Jun, Zhou Kun, Tao Changyuan. Advances in supported liquid membranes [J]. Chemical Research and Application, Vol. 16 (2004), Pages 160-164.

Google Scholar

[10] Gu Zhongmao. State of the art and recent progress of liquid membrane separation processes [J]. Membrane Science and Technology, Vol. 23 (2003), Pages 214-223.

Google Scholar

[11] Gerardo León, Guillermo Martínez, María Amelia Guzmán, Juan Ignacio Moreno, Beatriz Miguel, José Antonio Fernández-López. Increasing stability and transport efficiency of supported liquid membranes through a novel ultrasound-assisted preparation method. Its application to cobalt(II) removal [J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, Vol. 20 (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.10.002

Google Scholar