EEG-EMG Signal Processing and Analysis for the Neuromuscular Activity Patterns with Three Motion Modes under Two Time Intervals

Article Preview

Abstract:

To address the issue that how the EEG-EMG signals change according to different motion modes, an experiment was conducted on ten subjects with three tasks performing the voluntary, stimulated and imaginary finger flexion activities. The experiment was set two programs including 10s and 2s time intervals. Electroencephalogram (EEG) from C3/C4 channels and electromyogram (EMG) from flexor digitorum superficialis were recorded simultaneously. Besides the threshold detection of wave peaks between two points, morlet wavlet-based time-frequency analysis was adopted to study the independent variation mechanisms between EEG and EMG under different motion modes. The results indicated that EMG signals of 2s intervals exhibited a similar trend with 10s intervals. The EMG energy increased over 50 Hz when actions occurred. On the contrary, there were no significant changes in imaginary task. In addition, EEG signals performed obviously different. No pronounced similar changes were found in 10s and 2s intervals. Finally, the results demonstrated that EEG-EMG causality was high during 2s intervals in stimulation task.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

615-618

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Kelly. A history of the electrical activity of the brain: The first half-century[J]. Arch Intern Med, 1962, 110(6): 932-934.

DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1962.03620240114040

Google Scholar

[2] S. Suzuki, T. Matsui, K. Mikajiri and Y. Sakaguchi. An approach for the task performance estimation using biological signals just before and after the onset of voluntary motion[C]. ICCAS-SICE, 2009: 2531-2534.

Google Scholar

[3] NP. Reddy and V. Gupta. Toward direct biocontrol using surface EMG signals: Control of finger and wrist joint models[J]. Med Eng Phys, 2007, 29(3): 398-403.

DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.10.016

Google Scholar

[4] C. Disselhorst-Klug, T. Schmitz-Rode, and G. Rau. Surface electromyography and muscle force: Limits in sEMG-force relationship and new approaches for applications[J]. Clinical Biomechanic, 2009, 24(3): 225-235.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.08.003

Google Scholar

[5] P. Sbriccoli, I. Bazzucchi, A. Rosponi, M. Bernardi, G. De Vito, and F. Felici. Amplitude and spectral characteristics of biceps Brachii sEMG depend upon speed of isometric force generation[J]. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 2003, 13(2): 139-147.

DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(02)00098-6

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Hashimoto, J. Ushiba, A. Kimura, M. Liu, and Y. Tomita. Correlation between EEG-EMG coherence during isometric contraction and its imaginary execution[J]. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars), 2010, 70(1): 76-85.

Google Scholar

[7] D. Tuncel, A. Dizibuyuk and M. Kiymik. Time frequency based coherence analysis between EEG and EMG activities in fatigue duration[J]. Journal of medical systems, 2010, 34(2): 131-138.

DOI: 10.1007/s10916-008-9224-y

Google Scholar

[8] K. Keissar, LR. Davrath and S. Akselrod. Coherence analysis between respiration and heart rate variability using continuous wavelet transform[J]. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci, 2009, 367(1892): 1393-1406.

DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0273

Google Scholar

[9] V. Siemionow, V. Sahgal and GH. Yue. Single-trial EEG-EMG coherence analysis reveals muscle fatigue-related progressive alterations in corticomuscular coupling[J]. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2010, 18(2): 97-106.

DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2010.2047173

Google Scholar