Inspection of Large Guide Rail Precision Based on Bistatic Measurement Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Use two total stations cooperating with each other to measure the straightness of the guide rail. The straightness can test the accuracy of a large rail. Put the coordinates measuring with the two total station instruments to the same user coordinate system, take a key point between some distance with the auxiliary measuring tool of high precision, measure and record the key point s coordinate values. According to them, it can calculate the straightness of guide rail by using the least square method. The straightness accuracy of bistatic measurement can reach below 0.05mm, so it can meet the accuracy requirements.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 791-793)

Pages:

945-948

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Ning Yanping, and Liu Zhanfeng. The status of high precision linear measure techniques inside and outside[J]. Machinery Manufacturing Engineering, 2005 6 82–84.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhang Wenge, and Shi Feng. Tolerance and Technical Measurement[M]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, July (2010).

Google Scholar

[3] Zhang Shanchui, Yu Yingjie, and Zhang Zhijiang. Straightness Flatness Measurement Technology[M]. Beijing: China Metrology Publishing House, (1997).

Google Scholar

[4] Wang Ling. Methods of Straightness Error Measurement Accuracy[J]. Chinese Manufacturing Informatization, 2005 6 71–72.

Google Scholar

[5] Zhang Shiyong. How to Evaluate Misalignment Error with Least Square Straight-Line- Method[J]. Journal of Yuzhou University (Nat. Scien Edit ), 2001 18 29–31.

Google Scholar

[6] Chen Zhen, Xu Jingtian, and Sun Hua. The integrated adjustment and data processing based on the three dimensional observations of total station device[J]. Engineering Surveying and Mapping, 2009 3 40–44.

Google Scholar