Syngas Production via Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane in a Wall-Coated Monolith Reactor

Abstract:

The production of syngas via carbon dioxide reforming or dry methane reforming (DMR) was studied in the present study. To reduce pressure drop and improve the performance, the reaction was carried out over a 10%Ni/Al₂O₃-MgO catalyst in a wall-coated monolith reactor at about 600 ^°C, atmospheric pressure. The monolith reactor comprised of 37 circular flow channels of 3-mm-diameter. The reactant gases i.e. CH₄ and CO₂ at stoichiometric molar ratio of 1:2 was fed into the reactor at the volumetric flow rate of 450, 600 and 750 mL/min corresponding to various gas space velocities (GSV) i.e. 0.57, 0.76, and 0.96 s^-1, respectively. Under 24-hr continuous operations, the stability of system could be sustained and the deactivation by carbon deposition was not observed. The experimental results did show that the conversion of methane depended upon the GSV i.e. the %CH₄ conversion were 50, 45 and 40% for the GSV of 0.57, 0.76, and 0.96 s^-1, respectively. In addition, the %H₂ yield, %H₂ selectivity, %CO yield, %CO selectivity also depended on the feeding rate and so affected the performance of the wall-coated monolith reactor as a reformer.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 805-806)
• Pages: 1257-1264
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.805-806.1257
• Online since: September 2013
• Authors: Thanarak Srisurat*, Karn Pana-Suppamassadu, Phavanee Narataruksa, Sabaithip Tungkamani, Monrudee Phongaksorn, Thana Sornchamni
• Keywords: Dry Methane Reforming, Gas Space Velocity, Monolith Reactor, Wall-Coated Catalyst

References

[1] K.S. Patel, A.K. Sunol: Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. Vol. 32 (2007), p.2344.

[2] E. Ruckenstein, Y.H. Hu: Appl. Catal. A. Vol. 133 (1995), p.149.

[3] K. Nagaoka, K. Seshan, K. Aika, J.A. Lercher: J. Catal. Vol. 197 (2001), p.34.

[4] T. Ostrowski, A. Giroir-Fendler, C. Mirodatos, L. Mleczko: Catal. Today. Vol. 40 (1998), p.181.

[5] M.A. Dehkordi, M. Memari: Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. Vol. 34 (2009), pp.1275-1291.

[6] M.V. Twigg, Catalyst handbook. 2nd ed. Wolfe Publishing Ltd, London, England (1989), p.225.

[7] R. Mart´ınez, E. Romero, C. Guimon, R. Bilbao, Applied Catalysis A: General Vol. 274 (2004), p.139.

[8] S.Y. Foo,C. K. Cheng, Tuan-Huy Nguyen, A.A. Adesina, Catal. Today. Vol. 164, 2011, p.221.

[9] J.R. Rostrup-Nielsen, J. -H. Bak-Hansen: J. Catal. Vol. 144 (1992), p.38.

[10] A.F. Sammels, M. Schwartz, R.A. Mackay, T.F. Barton, D.R. Peterson: Catal. Today. Vol. 56(2000), p.325.

[11] J.N. Theron, M.E. Dry, E. Van Steen, J.C.G. Fletcher: Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. Vol. 107 (1997), pp.455-60.

[12] A.M. Adris, T. Boyd, C. Brereton, J.R. Grace, C.J. Lim, W. Wolfs, Production of pure hydrogen by the fluidized bed membrane reactor, In: Proceedings of 14th world hydrogen energy conference, Montreal, Canada; (2002).

DOI: 10.2202/1542-6580.1241

[13] S.S.E.H. Elnashaie, P. Prasad, Z. Chen: Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (2005), p.4871.

[14] D. Makel, Low cost microchannel reformer for hydrogen production from natural gas. In: California Energy Commission (CEG), Energy Innovations Small Grant (EISG) Program; (1999).

[15] O.P. Klenov, S.A. Pokrovskaya, N.A. Chumakova, S.N. Pavlova, V.A. Sadykov, A.S. Noskov: Catal. Today. Vol. 144 (2009), p.258.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2008.11.014

[16] B.D. Gould, X. Chen, J.W. Schwank: J. Catal. Vol. 250 (2007), p.209.

[17] L. Shi, D.J. Bayless, M.E. Prudich: Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. Vol. 34 (2009), p.7666.

[18] A. I. Tsyganok, T. Tsunoda, S. Hamakawa, K. Suzuki, K. Takehira, and T. Hayakawa, J. Catal. Vol. 213 (2003), p.191.

[19] N. Laosiripojana, S. Assabumrungrat: Appl. Catal A. Vol. 290 (2005), p.200.

[20] M. Lee, R. Greif, C. P Grigoropoulos, H.G. Park, F. K Hsu: J. Power Sources. Vol. 166 (2007), p.194.