Progress in Preliminary Processing of Eddy Covariance Flux Data

Article Preview

Abstract:

The eddy covariance (EC) technique of observation is a standard method for direct measurement of CO2, H2O and energy flux between vegetation and the atmosphere, the calculation formula of which is based on a series of assumptions. In reality, the assumed conditions are usually not satisfied, and the flux data is subject to significant deviation, thus the measured result should be corrected. The difference in data processing may lead to obvious difference in the calculated results of sensible heat flux and latent heat flux, while the universality of existing flux processing software is not verified. On the basis of domestic and foreign literature, this paper systematically summarizes and evaluates the preliminary processing of EC observation data in the aspects of principle and method of flux observation, rejection and interpolation of flux data, quality control and evaluation of flux data.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 807-809)

Pages:

1909-1914

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.D. Baldocchi, E. Falge, L. Gu, et al: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. Vol. 82(2001), p.2415.

Google Scholar

[2] M.L. Goulden, J.W. Munger, S.M. Fan, et al: Global Change Biology. Vol. 2(1996), p.169.

Google Scholar

[3] Zhengming Yang, Yie Jin. The Principle of Instrument for Agricultural Meteorology: Beijing Agricultural university Press, 1989(in chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Jiemin Wang, Weizhen Wang, Yinhuang Ao, et al: Advances in Earth Science. Vol. 22(8)(2007), p.791(in chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Ziwei Xu, Shaomin Liu, Lijuan Gong, et al: Advances in Earth Science. Vol. 23(4)(2008), p.357(in chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] C.J. Moore: Bound-Layer Meteor. Vol. 37(1986), p.17.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Mauder, S.P. Oncley, R. Vogt, et al: Bound-Layer Meteor. Vol. 123(2007), p.29.

Google Scholar

[8] E. Ohtaki, T. Matsui: Bound-Layer Meteor. Vol. 24(1982), p.109.

Google Scholar

[9] R. Leuning, J. Moncrieff: Bound-Layer Meteor. Vol. 53(1990), p.63.

Google Scholar

[10] Xia Song, Guirui Yu, Yunfen Liu, et al: Science in China, Ser D. Vol. 34(S2)(2004), p.67(in chinese).

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Yasuda, T. Watanabe: Bound-Layer Meteor. Vol. 100(2001), p.191.

Google Scholar

[12] T. Foken, B. Wichura: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Vol. 78(1996), p.83.

Google Scholar

[13] P. M. Lafleur, N. T. Roulet, S. W. Admiral: Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres. Vol. 106(D3)(2001), p.3071.

Google Scholar

[14] D. Vickers, L. Mahrt: Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology. Vol. 14(1997), p.512.

Google Scholar

[15] E. Falge: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Vol. 107(1)(2001), p.43.

Google Scholar

[16] Ziwei Xu, Shaomin Liu, Tongren Xu, et al: Advances in Earth Science. Vol. 24(4)(2009), p.372(in chinese).

Google Scholar

[17] M. Aubinet, et al: Advances in Ecological Research. Vol. 30(2000), p.113.

Google Scholar

[18] E.K. Webb, G.I. Pearman, R. Leuning: Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society: Vol. 106(1980), p.85.

Google Scholar

[19] G. Wohlfahrt: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Vol. 128 (324)(2005), p.141.

Google Scholar

[20] D.D. Baldocchi, B.E. Law, P.M. Anthoni: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Vol. 102(2000), p.187.

Google Scholar

[21] W.J. Massman, X. Lee: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Vol. 113(2002), p.121.

Google Scholar

[22] D.D. Baldocchi: Global Change Biology. Vol. 9(2003), p.479.

Google Scholar

[23] W. Kell, G. Allen, F. Eva, et al: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Vol. 113(2002), p.223.

Google Scholar

[24] J.C. Kaimal, D.A. Haugen: J App Meteorol. Vol. 8(1969), p.460.

Google Scholar

[25] J. Wilczak, S. Oncley, S.A. Stage: Boundary-Layer Meteorology. Vol. 99(2001), p.127.

Google Scholar

[26] A.A. Turnipseed, D.E. Anderson, P.D. Blanken, et al: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Vol. 119(2003), p.12.

Google Scholar

[27] U.K.T. Paw, D.D. Baldocchi, T. Meyers, et al: Bound-Layer Meteor. Vol. 97(2000), p.487.

Google Scholar

[28] R. Leuning: Measurements of trace gas fluxes in the atmosphere using eddy covariance: WPL corrections revisited. Lee X, Massman WJ, Law BE, et al. Handbook of micrometeorology. A guide to surface flux measurement and analysis, (2004).

DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-2265-4_6

Google Scholar

[29] M. Aubinet, B. Heinesch, B. Longdoz: Global Change Biology. Vol. 8(11)(2002), p.1053.

Google Scholar

[30] L.B. Flanagan, L.A. Wever, P.J. Carlson: Global Change Biology. Vol. 8(7)(2002), p.599.

Google Scholar

[31] P.M. Anthoni: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Vol. 111(3)(2002), p.203.

Google Scholar

[32] M.L. Goulden: Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol. 102(1997), p.28987.

Google Scholar

[33] L.H. Gu: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Vol. 128(3-4)(2005), p.179.

Google Scholar

[34] E.V. Gorsel, R. Leuning, H.A. Cleugh, et al: Tellus B. Vol. 59(2007), p.218.

Google Scholar

[35] H.P. Schmid: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Vol. 113(1-4)(2002), p.159.

Google Scholar

[36] J.L. Lumley: Journal of Atmosphere Science. Vol. 21(1964), p.99.

Google Scholar

[37] J.C. Kaimal, J.J. Finnigan: Atmospheric boundary layer flows. Oxford University Press, (1994).

Google Scholar

[38] R.B. Stull: To Boundory Layer Meteorology. QingDao Ocean University Press, 1988 (in chinese).

Google Scholar

[39] W.J. Massman: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Vol. 104(2000), p.185.

Google Scholar

[40] J.C. Kaimal, Y. Izumi, J.C. Wyngaard, et al: Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. Vol. 98(1972), p.563.

Google Scholar

[41] Min Xu, Weimei Jiang, Fei Hu, et al: Chinese Journal of Geophysics. Vol. 45(1)(2002), p.17(in chinese).

Google Scholar