Comparative Analysis of Specifications for Calculation of Prestress Losses in Chinese, US and European Concrete Codes

Hong Yan Ding; Yuan Liu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.816-817.144

Paper Titles

Simulated Welding Heat Affected Zone Toughness and Microstructure Transformation of a Ti-Zr Microalloyed Low Carbon Steel
p.124

Experimental Study on Impact Damage in CFRPs
p.129

High Cycle Fatigue (HCF) Performance of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Processed by Selective Laser Melting
p.134

A General Steel Hardenability Calculation Method
p.140

Comparative Analysis of Specifications for Calculation of Prestress Losses in Chinese, US and European Concrete Codes
p.144

BEM for Static and Dynamic Fracture Analysis in Thin Piezoelectric Structures
p.149

Experimental Study on the Effect of Water on Shear Strength Characteristic of Shale
p.153

Study of Calcium Acrylate on Compressive Strength and Hydration Process of Cement
p.161

Heat Transfer Measurements for the Horizontal Micro-Tubes Using Liquid Crystal Thermography
p.166

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 816-817Comparative Analysis of Specifications for...

Comparative Analysis of Specifications for Calculation of Prestress Losses in Chinese, US and European Concrete Codes

Abstract:

Since the generation of prestressed concrete, the causes for losses of prestress have been always analyzed and studied and many achievements are made. However, as the losses of prestress result from many factors, it is very complicated to calculate various losses of prestress accurately. The formulas and methods used in the concrete codes of various countries for calculation of prestress losses vary according to their different purposes. This paper focuses on US code ACI 318-05, Eurocode EN 1992-1-1 and Chinese code GB 50010-2010 (the code for design of concrete structures), and carries out a comparative analysis in terms of losses of prestress for the three codes above.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Manufacturing Science and Technology (ICMST2013)

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 816-817)

Pages:

144-148

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.816-817.144

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Hong Yan Ding, Yuan Liu

Keywords:

Comparison, Losses, Prestressed, Specification

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Code for Design Concrete Structures(GB 50010-2010)[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, (2010).

Google Scholar

[2] Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete(ACI 315M-05) [S]. American Concrete Institude, (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] Design of Concrete Structures(EN1992-1-1)[S]. European Committee for Standardization, (2004).

Google Scholar

[4] Gong Jinxin. China, U.S. and Europe's concrete structure design [M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2007: 591-611.

Google Scholar

[5] Xiong Xueyu. Prestressed friction loss and the suggestions for the reasonable design of anchorage loss [J], Industrial Building, 1998, 28(2): 5-9.

Google Scholar

[6] Niu Anyong. Concrete specification to compare China and India [J], Electric power design, 2007, 6: 58-64.

Google Scholar

[7] Xu Shuwu, Zhang Suli. Prestressed concrete stress loss analysis [J]. Hebei province water conservancy and hydropower technology, 2002, 3: 38-39.

Google Scholar

[8] Prestressed concrete rebar(GB/T 20065-2006) [S]. Beijing: Chinese Specification Press, (2006).

Google Scholar

[9] Edward a. Nawy. Prestressed Concrete-A Fundamental Approach[M]. Prentice Hall, 20.

Google Scholar