Design and Manufacture of an Ergonomic Computer Pen

Abstract:

A user friendly ergonomic computer input pen capable of obviating the use of the keyboard has been developed. It integrates the standard or conventional mouse functions with the touch stick input device functions. The pen-shaped input device developed can perform the normal mouse functions of scrolling and clicking together with handwriting recognition functions. From the stand point of ergonomic considerations, an input device which does not involve the keyboard and allows an operator to work efficiently is to be preferred in order to reduce the medical conditions called cumulative traumatic disorders (CTD) and repetitive strain injuries (RSI). A test set up to determine the acceptability of the ergonomic input pen using participants drawn from traditional mouse and keyboard users indicated a preference for the ergonomic computer pen. Also the average time by 15 participants to type a particular sentence containing all the letters of the English alphabet using the keyboard was 39.6 seconds, while the average time of the same 15 participants to write the same sentence using the ergonomic pen was 38.5 seconds.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 824)
• Pages: 239-245
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.824.239
• Online since: September 2013
• Authors: O. Odeghe, U.J. Udosen
• Keywords: Computer Keyboard, Cumulative Trauma Disorders (CTD), Ergonomic Pen, Mouse, Musculoskeletal Disorder (MSD), Repetitive Strain Injuries (RSI)

References

[1] S. Zhai, The Computer Mouse and Related Input Devices. Berkshire Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. 2004, Berkshire Publishing Group.

[2] K. Kotani and Ken Horii, An Analysis of Muscular Load and Performance in Using a Pen-tablet System, J. Physiol Anthropol, 2003, 22 (2) 89–95.

DOI: 10.2114/jpa.22.89

[3] A. Hedge, and C. Chao, Evaluation of Two Pen Mouse Designs, SAGE Journal, 2004, 48 (5) 818-822.

[4] C. Muller, L. Tomatis, T. Laubli, Muscular Load and Performance Compared between a Pen and a Computer Mouse as Input Devices. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2010, 40 (6) 607 – 617.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2010.08.004

[5] J. Serafine, E.H. Wughalter, Effect of Graphic Input Device and Repetition on Wrist Posture, SAGE Journal, 2004, 48 (12)1469- 1473.

DOI: 10.1037/e577122012-043

[6] A. Hedge, D.J. Feathers, and K.A. Rollings, Ergonomic Comparison of Slanted and Vertical Computer Mouse Designs. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2010, September 27 – October 1, 561 – 565.

DOI: 10.1177/154193121005400604

[7] U.J. Udosen, Evaluation and Improvement of Dvorak Keyboard Layout Using CADWORK. Advances In Materials Research, Vols. 62-64 (2009) p.585 – 591, ttp Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.62-64.585

[8] U.J. Udosen, Design of Keyboard Layout Using CADWORK, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, June 2007, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp.90-99, (2007).

[9] U.J. Udosen, Ergonomic Workplace Construction, Evaluation and Improvement by CADWORK, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36 (2006), 219 – 228, Elsevier.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2005.11.005

[10] C.H. Chang, B.C. Amick, C.C. Menendez, J.N. Katz, P.W. Johnson, M. Robertson, J.T. Dennerlein, Daily computer usage correlated with undergraduate students' musculoskeletal symptoms. Am J Ind Med. 2007 Jun; 50(6): 481-8.

DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20461

[11] J.H. Andersen, M. Harhoff, S. Grimstrup, I. Vilstrup, C.F. Lassen, L.P. Brandt. A.I. Kryger, E. Overgaard, K.D. Hansen , Mikkelsen S., Computer mouse use predicts acute pain but not prolonged or chronic pain in the neck and shoulder. Occup Environ Med. 2008 Feb; 65(2): 126-31.

DOI: 10.1136/oem.2007.033506

[12] M. de Ridder, M. Douwes, J. Groothausen, D. Osinga, A study on preventing RSI: the effect of data entry and pointing devices on posture, physical discomfort and fatigue in VDU workers, Ergonomics Journal, 1997, 22(3) 80-86.

[13] E.R. Brucklehurst, The NPL paper project, Int. J. Man-Machine studies, 1991, 34 (1), 69-95.