Removal of Toxic Arsenic and Antimony from Groundwater Spiro Tunnel Bulkhead in Park City Utah Using Colloidal Iron Hydroxide: Comparison with Reverse Osmosis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Verification testing of two model technologies in pilot scale to remove arsenic and antimony based on reverse osmosis and chemical coagulation/filtration systems was conducted in Spiro Tunnel Water Filtration Plant located in Park City, Utah, US. The source water was groundwater in abandoned silver mine, naturally contaminated by 60-80 ppb of arsenic and antimony below 10 ppb. This water represents one of the sources of drinking water for Park City and constitutes about 44% of the water supply. The failure to remove antimony efficiently by coagulation/filtration (only 4.4% removal rate) under design conditions is discussed in terms of the chemistry differences between Sb (III, V) and As (III, V). Removal of Sb(V) at pH > 7, using coagulation/filtration technology, requires much higher (50 to 80 times) concentration of iron (III) than As. The stronger adsorption of arsenate over a wider pH range can be explained by the fact that arsenic acid is tri-protic, whereas antimonic acid is monoprotic. This difference in properties of As(V) and Sb(V) makes antimony (V) more difficult to be efficiently removed in low concentrations of iron hydroxide and alkaline pH waters, especially in concentration of Sb < 10 ppb.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 83-86)

Pages:

553-562

Citation:

Online since:

December 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Council of the European Communities. Council Directive 76/464/EEC of 4 May, (1976) on Pollution Caused by Certain Dangerous Substances Discharged into Aquatic Environment of the Community; Official Journal. 1976, 129, pp.23-29.

DOI: 10.1017/s0020782900034732

Google Scholar

[2] United States Environmental Protection Agency. Water Related Fate of the 129 Priority Pollutants; Doc. 745-R-00-007; USEPA: Washington, DC. 1979, Vol. 1.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Filela, M.; Belzile, N.; Chen, Y.W. Antimony in the environment: a review focused on natural waters I. Occurrence, Earth-Sci. Rev. 2002, 57, pp.125-176.

DOI: 10.1016/s0012-8252(01)00070-8

Google Scholar

[4] Y.W. Chen, Y.W., Deng, T.L.; Filella, M.; Belzile, N., Distribution and early digenesis of antimony species in sediments and pore-waters of freshwater lakes, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, pp.1163-1168.

DOI: 10.1021/es025931k

Google Scholar

[5] Gebel, T. Arsenic and antimony: Comparative approach on mechanistic toxicology, Chem., Biol. Interact. 1997, 107, pp.131-144.

DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2797(97)00087-2

Google Scholar

[6] WHO, Antimony in drinking water. Background document for development WHO Guidelines for drinking water quality, www. antimony in drinking water, (2003).

DOI: 10.1007/springerreference_30502

Google Scholar

[7] Toxicological profile for antimony and compounds, US Department of Health & Human Services, ATSDR/TP-91/02, September (1992).

Google Scholar

[8] Onishi, H, Antimony. In Handbook of Geochemistry; K.H. Wedeppohl (ed). Springer- Verlag: Berlin. 1978, Vol. II/4.

Google Scholar

[9] Pourbaix, M. Atlas of electrochemical equilibrium in aqueous solution. New York: Oxford, Pergamon. 1996, p.644.

Google Scholar

[10] Kang, M.; Kamei, T.; Magara, Y. Comparing polyaluminum chloride and chloride for antimony removal, Water Research. 200, 37, pp.4173-4179.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(03)00351-8

Google Scholar

[11] Edwards, M. Chemistry of arsenic-removal during coagulation and Fe-Mn oxidation, J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 1994, 86, pp.64-78.

DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1994.tb06247.x

Google Scholar

[12] Pawlak, Z., Rabiega, G., Scanlan, L. Cartwright, P. Speciation of arsenic in groundwater and technologies for removal of arsenic in drinking water in the Spiro Tunnel Bulkhead, Park City, Utah, USA, Ars Separatoria Acta 2003, 2, pp.71-83.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.83-86.553

Google Scholar

[13] E. Wiberg, E.,. Holleman, A.F. Inorganic Chemistry, Elsevier, (2001).

Google Scholar

[14] Kang, M., Kawasaki, M.; Tamada, S.; Kamei, T.: Magara, Y. Effect of pH on the removal of arsenic and antimony using reverse osmosis membrane, Desalination 2000, 11, pp.293-298.

DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(00)90027-4

Google Scholar

[15] Stefansson, A. Iron (III) hydrolysis and solubility at 25 oC, Enviromn. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, pp.6117-6123.

Google Scholar

[16] Pawlak, Z.; Zak, S.; Zablocki, L. Removal of hazardous metals from groundwater by reveres osmosis, Polish J. Environ. Stud. 2006, 15, pp.579-583.

Google Scholar

[17] Park City SWTP. http: /www. parkcity. org/citydepartments/water/projects/. (2008).

Google Scholar

[18] Pawlak, Z.; Rauckyte, T.; Zak, S.; Praveen, P. Study of arsenic in mine ground-water commonly used for human consumption in Utah, Environ. Technol. 2008, 29, pp.217-224.

DOI: 10.1080/09593330802028956

Google Scholar

[19] NSF Report No. 01/26/EPADW 395, March, Environmental Technology Verification Report, Removal of Arsenic in Drinking Water. Electronic copy available on EPA website: http: /www. epa. gov/etv or NSF website: http: /www. nsf. org/etv. (2001).

DOI: 10.13031/2013.6046

Google Scholar

[20] NSF Report 01/23/EPADW 395, Environmental Technology, September 2001, Verification Report. Removal of Arsenic in Drinking Water. Electronic copy available on EPA website: http: /www. epa. gov/etv or NSF website: http: /www. nsf. org/etv. (2001).

DOI: 10.13031/2013.6046

Google Scholar

[21] EPA Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, EPA Methods is available from National Technical Information Services (NTIS).

Google Scholar

[22] 18th Edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water American Water Works Association. (1992).

Google Scholar

[23] D. Clifford, D.; L. Ceber, L.; Chow, S. Arsenic (III)/arsenic (V) separation by chloride-form ion-exchange resins, Proceedings of the XI AWWA Water Quality Technology Conference (WQTC), December 1983, Norfolk, VA. 1984, pp.223-236.

Google Scholar

[24] Edwards, S.; Patel, S.; McNill, L.; Chen, H.; Frey, M.; A.D. Eaton, A.D.; Antweiler, R.C.; Taylor, H.E. Considerations in As analysis and speciation, J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 1998, 90, pp.103-113.

DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1998.tb08402.x

Google Scholar

[25] Ficklin, W.H. Separation of arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) in groundwaters by ion exchange Talanta. 1983, 30, pp.371-373.

DOI: 10.1016/0039-9140(83)80084-8

Google Scholar

[26] Shokes, T.E.; Moller, G. Removal of dissolved heavy metals from acid using iron metal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, pp.282-287.

DOI: 10.1021/es980543x

Google Scholar

[27] Stumm, W.; Morgan, J.J. Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural Waters, third ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, (1996).

Google Scholar

[28] Leyva, A.D.; Marrero, J.; P. Smichowski, P.; Cicerone, D. Sorption of antimony onto hydroapatite, Environ Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, pp.3669-3675.

DOI: 10.1021/es0009929

Google Scholar

[29] Dixit, S.; Hering, J.G. Comparison of arsenic (V) and arsenic (III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: Implication for arsenic mobility, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, pp.4182-4289.

DOI: 10.1021/es030309t

Google Scholar

[30] Baes, C.F.; R.E. Mesmer, R.M. The Hydrolysis of Cations, Wiley, New York. (1976).

Google Scholar

[31] A.K. Leuz, H. Monch and C.A. Johnson, Sorption of Sb (III) and Sb (V) to goethite: Influence on Sb(III) oxidation and mobilization, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, pp.7277-7282.

DOI: 10.1021/es061284b

Google Scholar

[32] Leuz, A.K.; Monch, H.; Johnson, C.A. Iron-mediated oxidation of antimony (III), by oxygen and hydrogen peroxide compared to arsenic (III) oxidation, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 25652571.

DOI: 10.1021/es052059h

Google Scholar

[33] Batelle, Evaluation of treatment technologies for the removal of arsenic from drinking waters: iron removal. Prepared for EPA, February (2000).

Google Scholar

[34] Ning, R.Y.; Arsenic removal by reverse osmosis. Desalination, 2002, 143, pp.237-241.

DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(02)00262-x

Google Scholar

[35] Sledge, G.D. Proposed arsenic in drinking water rule regulatory impact analysis, EPA 815-R000-013, chapter 6, June (2000).

Google Scholar

[36] NSF Report 01/25/EPAWD395, Environmental Technology Verification Report. Removal of arsenic in drinking water, Electronic copy is available on EPA website: http: /www. epa. gov/etv or NSF website: http: /www. nsf. org/etv. August (2001).

DOI: 10.13031/2013.6046

Google Scholar

[37] NSF Report 01/20/EPADW395, Environmental Technology Verification Report. Removal of arsenic in drinking water, Electronic copy available on EPA website: http: /www. epa. govetv or NSF website: http: /www. nsf. org/etv. March (2001).

DOI: 10.13031/2013.6046

Google Scholar