Response of Carbon Sink Dynamic Behaviors to River Flood in Karst Area – A Case Study in the Li River of Guilin

Article Preview

Abstract:

Li River appeared successively three times floods during May 8-17, 2012. We were high-frequency monitoring during the flood once every hour, real time monitoring the pH value, water temperature, EC(electrical conductivity), pCO2(carbon dioxide partial pressure), HCO3- and flow rate, analyzing karst carbon sinks dynamic changes during the flood. It was found that river hydrochemistry and karst carbon sinks in different stages with different variations in Li River. These floods were divided into 5 stages to discuss, researches have shown: AtIand Vstage the river hydrochemistry is not subjected to flooding, pCO2 and pH value, water temperature has distinct characteristics of diurnal variation. EC, flow rate and HCO3- is relatively stable; II, III and IV stage appear different changes characteristics are due to effects of flood, flow rate and HCO3- have a positive correlation at IV stage, with opposite of stage II and III stage. We use water chemistry-runoff method to calculate the amount of carbon sinks in the flood, found in the flood related coefficients between carbon sink and HCO3-, flow rate respectively 0.87 and 0.33. The carbon sink is 3491.06 t C during the flood monitoring, in which carbon sink at IVstage in flood are 4.52 times prior to the flood, which account for that carbon sink in the flood is much larger than the front of flood.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

353-362

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] IPCC.IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007. Working Croup I Report: The Physical Science Basis, 2007: 137-140.

Google Scholar

[2] YUAN Dao-xian, LIU Zai-hua, LIN Yu-shi, et al. Karst Dynamic System in China [M]. Beijing: Geological Press, 2002: 1-3.

Google Scholar

[3] YUAN Dao-xian, ZHANG Cheng. Karst Dynamics Theory in China and its Practice [J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica. 2008, 29(3): 355-365.

Google Scholar

[4] LIU Zai-hua. Contribution of Carbonate Rock Weathering to the Atomspheric CO2 Sink [J]. Carsologica Sinica. 2000, 19(4): 293-300.

Google Scholar

[5] XU Sheng-you, JIANG Zhong-cheng. Preliminary Estimate for Karstification and CO2 Source/sink of Atmospheric Greenhouse Gases in China [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1997: 953-956.

Google Scholar

[6] Yoshimura K, Inokura Y. The Geochemical Cycle of Carbon Dioxide in a Carbonate Rock Area, A kiyo shi-dai Plateau, Yamaguchi, Southwestern Japan [A]. In: roc. 30th Int. Geol [C]. 1997, 24: 114-126.

Google Scholar

[7] He Shi-yi, Kang Zhi-qiang, Li Qing-yan. The Utilization of Real-Time High Resolution Mornitoring Skill in Karst Carbon Sequestration: A Case of the Station in Banzhai Subterranean Stream Catchment[J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2011, 7(3): 157-161.

DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1248.2012.00054

Google Scholar

[8] LIN Hong-ying, HAN Wu-ying. Carbon Flux and Carbon Cycle of Pearl River Basin [J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 1992, 14(1): 56-63.

Google Scholar

[9] SUN Hui-guo, HAN Jing-tai, ZHANG Shu-rong, et al. The Effect of River Carbon Export Fluxes in Extraordinary Flood 05-06 on the West River [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2006, 51(23): 2773-2779.

Google Scholar

[10] DENG Zi-qiang, LIN Yu-shi, ZHANG Mei-liang, et al. Guilin Karst and geological structure [M]. Chongqing : Chongqing press, 1988: 9-19.

Google Scholar

[11] A History of Li River Compilation Committee. A History of Li River [M]. Guangxi People Press, 2004: 5-10.

Google Scholar

[12] Information on http: /xxfb. hydroinfo. gov. cn/nindex_dataList. jsp?type=1.

Google Scholar

[13] Information on http: /www. weather. com. cn/weather/101300501. shtml.

Google Scholar

[14] YU Shi, He Shi-yi, YANG Hui. Research on Carbon Source Effect of Acid Rain in a Typical Carbonate Rock Area, Guangxi[J]. Earth and Environment, 2012, 40(1): 44-49.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.295-298.314

Google Scholar

[15] ZHANG Wei, QIN Xiao-qun, YI Lian-xing, et al. Ground Water Resource Assessment Under the Conditions to Control Ground Subsidence—A Case Study in Shanghai City [J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2004, 23(3): 169-176.

Google Scholar

[16] TANG Wei, KANG Zhi-qiang, YIN Jian-jun1, et al. Response of Karst Carbon Sink Dynamic Behaviors to Rainfall—a Case Study in Maocun Subterranean River of Guilin[J]. Earth and Environment, 2011, 39(2): 161-166.

Google Scholar

[17] Liu Zai-hua, W. Dreybrodt . The DBL Model and Prediction of Calcite Dissolution/Precipitation Rates Carsologica Sinica [J]. Carsologica Sinica, 1998, 17(1): 1-7.

Google Scholar

[18] Smith S V, Hollibaugh J T. Annual Cycle and Interannual Variability of Net and Gross Ecosystem Metabolism in a Temperate Climate Embayment [J]. Ecol Monogr, 1997, 67: 509-533.

DOI: 10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0509:acaivo]2.0.co;2

Google Scholar

[19] Webster I T, Parslow J S, Smith S V. Implications of spatial and temporal variation for biogeochemical budgets of estuaries [J]. Estuaries, 2000, 23(3): 341-350.

DOI: 10.2307/1353326

Google Scholar