Study on the Correlation between Cone Resistance and Soil Density Using Centrifuge Robot CPT

Article Preview

Abstract:

Density is one of the most important soil parameters. However, it is difficult to measure the density of soil model during centrifuge in flight. The cone penetration test (CPT) with robot provides a useful tool to determine the soil density of different models, as the cone resistance is closely related to soil density. This paper presents the correlation between cone resistance and relative density of sand, by doing centrifuge tests with robot CPT. Based on the test results, a formula that describes the correlation between cone resistance and sand relative density of Fujian standard sand is proposed for IWHR CPT attached to centrifuge robot.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

336-340

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P. K. Robertson and K. L. Cabal (Robertson). Guide to Cone Penetration Testing for Geotechnical Engineering[M]. Gregg Drilling & Testing, Inc. 2010: 6.

Google Scholar

[2] Li Guangxin. Advanced soil mechanics[M]. Beijing, Tsinghua University Press. 2004: 20–21, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[3] Wan Guangchen, Chen Jian, Zhu Qi. Applications of Technical Achievements in Cone Penetration Test in Engineering [J]. Railway Investigation and Surveying,2011, 1: 37-40, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[4] Liu Yongxue, Peng Guoping, Meng Fanfu. Application of Static Cone Penetration Test in Geotechnical Engineering Investigation [J]. Forestry Science and Technology Information, 2003, 35(2): 78-80, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[5] Xu Hua. Application of Pore Water Pressure Static Cone Penetration Test in Shanghai area[J]. Geotechnical Engineering Technique, 1999, 3: 57-59, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[6] Zhou Jingxing, Li Guangxin, Yu Shimin, Wang Hongjin. Foundation Engineering (2)[M]. Beijing, Tsinghua University Press. 2007: 162-165, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[7] Zhou Shengen. Evaluation of the Liquefaction of Sand by Static Cone Penetration Test [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1980, 2(3): 38-45, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[8] Wu Daoxiang, Shan Cancan, Zhong Xuanming, Wang Guoqiang. Development of CPT and its application in geotechnical engineering [J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Natural Science), 2008, 31(2): 211-215, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[9] Jian Wenbin, Wu Zhenxiang, Tong Wende, Liu Huiming, Zhang Minxia. Consolidation State of Soft Soil Differentiated by Static Cone Sounding [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(12): 2166-2169, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[10] Bolton, M. D., Gui, M. W. and Philips, R. Review of miniature soil probes for model tests[J]. Eleventh Southeast Aisan geotechnical conference 4-8 May, 1993, Singapore: 85-90.

Google Scholar

[11] Yu, H. S., Mitchell, J. K., Analysis of cone resistance: review of methods[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 1998, 124(2): 140-149.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(1998)124:2(140)

Google Scholar

[12] Bolton, M. D., Gui, M. W., Garnier, J., Corte, J. F., Bagge, G., Laue, J. and Renzi, R. Centrifuge cone penetration tests in sand [J]. Géotechnique, 1999, 49(4): 543-552.

DOI: 10.1680/geot.1999.49.4.543

Google Scholar

[13] Gui, M. W., Bolton, M. D., Garnier J., Corte, J. F., Bagge, G., Laue, J. and Renzi, R. Guidelines for cone penetration tests in sand [J]. Centrifuge 98, Kimura, Kusakabe & Takemura(eds), 1998 Balkema, Rotterdam, 155–160.

DOI: 10.1680/geot.1999.49.4.543

Google Scholar

[14] Y. Du, S. Zhu, L. Han and L. Ru. LXJ-4-450 Geotechnical centrifuge in Beijing [C], Centrifuge 94, Singapore, Balkema, pp.35-39.

Google Scholar

[15] Y.J. Hou, Y.F. Wen, X.D. Zhang, Q.L. Sun, C. Gauffre, P. Sabard1 and D. Rames. Development of IWHR Centrifuge Controlled Tools System[C]. Proceedings of the First Asian Workshop on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 2012: 119-124.

Google Scholar