Failure of Geotextile-Reinforced Walls in Centrifuge Model Tests

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents the results of centrifuge tests performed to investigate the behavior of geotextile-reinforced soil walls beyond stress conditions. The models were built using nonwoven fabrics as reinforcement layers and dry sand as backfill. Digital image analysis techniques were used to determine the displacement of sand markers placed along the reinforcements. The models were loaded until failure by increasing centrifugal acceleration, and the movements of the sand markers were used to determine the strain distributions along the reinforcement layers. The results revealed that stresses redistribute among reinforcement layers as models approach failure. Current design methods for GRS walls were found to be conservative when applied to predict the behavior of the reduced-scale models.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

321-325

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Arriaga, F., 2003. Response of geosynthetic-reinforced structures under working stress and failure conditions, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 205p.

Google Scholar

[2] Jaber, M. B., 1989. Behavior of reinforced soil walls in centrifuge model tests. Berkeley, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 239p.

Google Scholar

[3] ASTM D4595, Standard test method for tensile properties of geotextiles by the wide-width strip method, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

DOI: 10.1520/d4595-05

Google Scholar

[4] Costa, C. M. L., 2004. Time-dependent deformations in geotextile reinforced soil walls, Ph.D. Thesis, School of Engineering at Sao Carlos, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 330p. (in Portuguese).

DOI: 10.15584/ejcem.2022.3.10

Google Scholar

[5] Zornberg, J. G. and Arriaga, F., 2003, Strain Distribution within Geosynthetic-Reinforced Slopes. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, v. 129, n. 1, 32-45.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2003)129:1(32)

Google Scholar

[6] Zornberg, J. G., 1994, Performance of geotextile-reinforced soil structures. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.

Google Scholar

[7] Zornberg, J. G., Sitar, N., and Mitchell, J. K., 1998, Performance of geosynthetic reinforced slopes at failure. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, v. 124, n. 8, 670-683.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(1998)124:8(670)

Google Scholar

[8] Wilson-Fahmy, R. F., Koerner, R. M. and Fleck, J. A., 1993, Unconfined and confined wide width tension testing of geosynthetics. In: Cheng, S. J. C. Geosynthetics soil reinforcement testing procedures. Philadelphia, pp.49-63.

DOI: 10.1520/stp24312s

Google Scholar

[9] Ballegeer, J. P., Wu, J. T. H., 1993. Intrinsic confined and unconfined load-deformation properties of geotextiles. In: Cheng, S. J. C. Geosynthetics soil reinforcement testing procedures. Philadelphia. pp.16-31.

DOI: 10.1520/stp24310s

Google Scholar

[10] Christopher, B. R., Holtz, R. D. and Bell, W. D., 1986, New tests for determining the in-soil stress-strain properties of geotextiles. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Geotextiles, Vienna, Austria, 3, 683-688.

Google Scholar