Heat Transfer Performance of Different Nanofluids Flows in a Helically Coiled Heat Exchanger

Article Preview

Abstract:

Helically coiled heat exchangers are globally used in various industrial applications for their high heat transfer performance and compact size. Nanofluids can provide excellent thermal performance of this type of heat exchangers. In the present study, the effect of different nanofluids on the heat transfer performance in a helically coiled heat exchanger is examined. Four different types of nanofluids CuO/water, Al2O3/water, SiO2/water, and ZnO/water with volume fractions 1 vol.% to 4 vol.% was used throughout this analysis and volume flow rate was remained constant at 3 LPM. Results show that the heat transfer coefficient is high for higher particle volume concentration of CuO/water, Al2O3/water and ZnO/water nanofluids, while the values of the friction factor and pressure drop significantly increase with the increase of nanoparticle volume concentration. On the contrary, low heat transfer coefficient was found in higher concentration of SiO2/water nanofluids. The highest enhancement of heat transfer coefficient and lowest friction factor occurred for CuO/water nanofluids among the four nanofluids. However, highest friction factor and lowest heat transfer coefficient were found for SiO2/water nanofluids. The results reveal that, CuO/water nanofluids indicate significant heat transfer performance for helically coiled heat exchanger systems though this nanofluids exhibits higher pressure drop.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

160-165

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S.U.S Choi, Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles, in: D.A. Siginer, H.P. Wang (Eds.), Developments and Applications of Non-Newtonian Flows, ASME, New York, 1995, pp.99-105.

Google Scholar

[2] X. Wang, X. Xu, S.U.S Choi, Thermal conductivity of nanoparticle-fluid mixture, J. Thermophys. Heat Transf. 13 (1999) 474-480.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Lee, S.U.S Choi, S. Li, J.A. Eastman, Measuring thermal conductivity of fluids containing oxide nanoparticles, J. Heat Transfer. 121 (1999) 280-289.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2825978

Google Scholar

[4] S.K. Das, N. Putra, P. Thiesen, W. Roetzel, Temperature dependence of thermal conductivity enhancement for nanofluids, J. Heat Transfer. 125 (2003) 567-574.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1571080

Google Scholar

[5] D. Prabhanjan, G. Raghavan, T. Rennie, Comparison of heat transfer rates between a straight tube heat exchanger and a helically coiled heat exchanger, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer. 29 (2002) 185-191.

DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1933(02)00309-3

Google Scholar

[6] M. Yasuo, N. Wataru, Study on forced convective heat transfer in curved pipes:(1st report, laminar region), Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 8 (1965) 67-82.

DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(65)90098-0

Google Scholar

[7] C. Kalb, J. Seader, Heat and mass transfer phenomena for viscous flow in curved circular tubes, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 15 (1972) 801-817.

DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(72)90122-6

Google Scholar

[8] N. Jamshidi, M. Farhadi, D.D. Ganji, K. Sedighi, Experimental analysis of heat transfer enhancement in shell and helical tube heat exchangers, Appl. Therm. Eng. 51 (2012) 644-652.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.10.008

Google Scholar

[9] M. Raja, R.M. Arunachalam, S. Suresh, Experimental studies on heat transfer of alumina/water nanofluid in a shell and tube heat exchanger with wire coil insert, Int. J. Mech. Mater. Eng. 7 (2012) 16-23.

Google Scholar

[10] H.A. Mohammed, H.A. Hasan, M.A. Wahid, Heat transfer enhancement of nanofluids in a double pipe heat exchanger with louvered strip inserts, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer. 40 (2013) 36-46.

DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2012.10.023

Google Scholar

[11] J.C. Maxwell, A treatise on electricity and magnetism, Clarendon Press, 1881.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Einstein, Investigation on the Theory of Brownian Motion, Dover, New York, 1956.

Google Scholar

[13] Gherasim, G. Roy, C.T. Nguyen, D. Vo-Ngoc, Experimental investigation of nanofluids in confined laminar radial flows, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 48 (2009) 1486-1493.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2009.01.008

Google Scholar

[14] Y. Xuan,W. Roetzel, Conceptions for heat transfer correlation of nanofluids, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 43 (2000) 3701-3707.

DOI: 10.1016/s0017-9310(99)00369-5

Google Scholar

[15] P.M. Kumar, J. Kumar, S. Suresh, Heat Transfer and Friction Factor Studies in Helically Coiled Tube using Al2O3/water Nanofluid, Eur. J. Sci. Res. 82 (2012) 161-172.

DOI: 10.1007/s12206-012-1206-9

Google Scholar

[16] N. Kannadasan, K. Ramanathan, S. Suresh, Comparison of heat transfer and pressure drop in horizontal and vertical helically coiled heat exchanger with CuO/water based nano fluids, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 42 (2012) 64-70.

DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.03.031

Google Scholar

[17] M.R. Sohel, R. Saidur, M.F.M. Sabri, M. Kamalisarvestani, M.M. Elias, A. Ijam, Investigating the heat transfer performance and thermophysical properties of nanofluids in a circular micro-channel, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer. 42 (2013) 75-81.

DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2012.12.014

Google Scholar

[18] S.M. Hashemi, M.A. Akhavan-Behabadi, An empirical study on heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of CuO–base oil nanofluid flow in a horizontal helically coiled tube under constant heat flux, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer. 39 (2012) 144-151.

DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2011.09.002

Google Scholar