Assessment of a Traction Model for Agricultural Tires Based on a Variable Shear Area Model and Experimental Data

Article Preview

Abstract:

The tire driving force is the resultant of the elementary shear forces acting under the running gear contact area; while the tire ground contact area may be assumed to be constant, the sheared area increases with slip but is generally less then the tire-soil contact area. As a result, it may be considered that the tractive force is the result of the elementary forces acting along the portion of the contact area that participates in the shearing process. Starting from this idea, the paper tries to evaluate the shearing area using a traction model and experimental traction data. The traction model and the field tests referred to the driving tires of a 2WD Romanian U-650 tractor; the comparison between experimental data concerning the traction force and the results given by the traction model allowed evaluation of the shear area, using a Komandi type relationship, assuming that shear area is linked to the tire-ground contact area by the means of a wheel slip depending shape parameter D. The goodness-of-fit test applied to the original Komandi equation led to conclusion that this equation was not appropriate for the evaluation of the shear area, at least not for the test conditions. A much better goodness-of-fit between the measured traction forces and the ones predicted by the model was achieved when a modified Komandi type relation was used in order to describe the shape parameter. In this case, 77.8% of the of model predictions were within the 95% confidence interval of each corresponding experimental data point, compared to only 22.2% for the original Komandi equation. In terms of traction efficiency, the modified Komandi equation also led to a better fit between theoretical and experimental data.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

458-463

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Hambleton, A. Drescher, Development of improved test rolling methods for roadway embankment construction, Research 2008-08, University of Minnesota, Minnesota Department of Transportation Research Services Section (available at http: /www. lrrb. org/PDF/200808. pdf).

Google Scholar

[2] I. C. Schmid, Interaction of vehicle and terrain – results from 10 years research at IKK, 6th European ISTVS Conference, Wien (1994).

Google Scholar

[3] R. L. Raper, D. C. Erbach, Prediction of soil stresses using the finite element method, Transactions of the ASAE 33(3) (1990) 725-730.

Google Scholar

[4] R. Roşca, E. Rakoşi, Gh. Manolache, Wheel Traction Prediction - A Comparison Between Models and Experimental Data, SAE Technical Papers Series 2004-01-2707 (2004), Warrendale PA.

DOI: 10.4271/2004-01-2707

Google Scholar

[5] G. Komandi, Reevaluation of the adhesive relationship between the tire and the soil, Journal of Terramechanics 30 (2) (1993) 77-83.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-4898(93)90021-o

Google Scholar

[6] M. Schreiber, H. D. Kutzbach, Comparison of different zero-slip definitions and a proposal to standardize tire traction performance, Journal of Terramechanics 44 (2007) 75-79.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2006.03.003

Google Scholar

[7] S. Nastasoiu, C. Andreescu, S. Popescu, Gh. Fraţilă, D. Cristea, Tractors (in romanian), Didactic and pedagogic Publishing House, Bucharest, 1983, pp.84-91.

Google Scholar

[8] B. Maclaurin, Comparing the NRMM (VCI), MMP and VLCI traction models, Journal of Terramechanics 44 (2007) 43-51.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2006.01.005

Google Scholar

[9] S. K. Upadhyaya, D. Wulfson, G. Jubbal, Traction prediction equations for radial ply tires, Journal of Terramechanics 26 (2) (1989) 149-175.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-4898(89)90004-9

Google Scholar

[10] B. Lach, The influence of tire inflation pressure – a comparison between simulation and experiment, Proceedings of the 1st East Europ. Conf. of the ISTVS, Wroclaw (1996).

Google Scholar

[11] K.A. Abd El-Gawwad, D. A. Crolla, A. M. A. Soliman, F. M. El-Sayed, Off-road tire modeling IV: extended treatment of tire-terrain interaction for the multi-spoke model, Journal of Terramechanics 36 (1999) 77-90.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4898(98)00034-2

Google Scholar

[12] A. K. Elwaleed, A. Yahya, M. Zohadie, D. Ahmad, A. F. Kheiralla, Effect of inflation pressure on motion resistance of a high-lug agricultural tire, Journal of Terramechanics 43 (2006) 69-84.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2004.08.006

Google Scholar

[13] W. W. Brixius, Traction prediction equations for bias ply tires, ASAE Paper 87-1622, St. Joseph, Michigan (1987).

Google Scholar

[14] C. D. Schunn, D. Wallach, Evaluating goodness-of-fit in comparison of models to data, in: Psychologie der Kognition: Reden and Vorträge anlässlich der Emeritierung von Werner Tack., W. Tack (Ed. ), University of Saarland Press, Saarbrueken, Germany, 2005, pp.115-154.

Google Scholar

[15] S. K. Upadhyaya, D. Wulfsohn, Traction prediction using soil parameters obtained with an instrumented analog device, Journal of Terramechanics 30 (1993) 85–100.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-4898(93)90022-p

Google Scholar