Model and Analysis of the Key Factors Influencing Organizational Changes Implementation within Business Processes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Change is a common place nowadays. The fulminant engineering, innovation and globalization era brought with it an avalanche of changes and multiple challenges that organizations must face. Despite the change theme has been thought out and researched by hundreds of specialists, the practice shows that organizations have yet difficulties in implementing the changes they need. This is the motive why managers must deal with the issue of organizational changes carefully and take into consideration all factors that contribute to successful implementation of projects and changes that may increase the performance of companies they belong. Purpose The aim of this article is modelling and analysis the key factors that influence the organizational changes implementation within the business processes. Research, methodology Based on the main concepts in literature, a new specific model centered on the key factors that influence the organizational changes implementation within business processes will be presented and analysed. Findings The results indicate the main factors that influence change implementation in business processes and show a number of solutions for increase the success rate of this challenge for all the leaders of organizations. Originality, value The article promote a specific model of key factors that influence the organizational changes implementation, based on a critical review of change management literature. Numerous authors suggest a lot of recommendations for using and combining the factors of changes implementation, so that the results of change efforts to be the expected ones, but it is up to the leaders how they manage to implement researchers solutions in their organizations. This article presents that specific ways for Romanian managers, fitting with Romanian business environment. Implications This work leads to a better understanding of the key factors of the organizational changes implementation. The managers will have new perspectives to approach this matter and new solutions, in order to improve the change processes required by business.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

624-627

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H.J. Walker, A.A. Armenakis, J.B. Bernerth, Factors influencing organizational change efforts. An integrative investigation of change content, context, process and individual differences, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 20, No. 6 (2007).

DOI: 10.1108/09534810710831000

Google Scholar

[2] A. Meyer, G. Brooks, J. Goer, Environmental jolts and industry revolution: organizational responses to discontinuous change, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11 (1990), 93-0110.

Google Scholar

[3] P. Kelly, T. Amburgey, Organizational inertia and momentum: a dynamic model of strategic change, Academy of Management Journal (1991), 591-612.

DOI: 10.5465/256407

Google Scholar

[4] H. Haveman, Between a rock and a hard place: organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37 (1992), 48-75.

DOI: 10.2307/2393533

Google Scholar

[5] F. Damanpour, Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34 (1991), 555-590.

DOI: 10.5465/256406

Google Scholar

[6] A.A. Armenakis, A.G. Bedeian, Organizational change: a review of theory and research in the 1990s, Journal of Management, Vol. 25 (1999), 293-315.

DOI: 10.1177/014920639902500303

Google Scholar

[7] A.E. Reichers, J.P. Wanous, J.T. Austin, Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 11 (1997), 48-59.

DOI: 10.5465/ame.1997.9707100659

Google Scholar

[8] K. Lewin, Frontiers in Group Dynamics: Concept, Method, and Reality in Social Science; Social Equilibria and Social Change, Human Relations, Vol. 1 (1947).

DOI: 10.1177/001872674700100103

Google Scholar

[9] P. Kotter, Leading Change, Harvard Business Review, (1995).

Google Scholar

[10] R. McAdam, T. Walker, S.A. Hazlett, An inquiry into the strategic-operational role of performance management in local government, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 24 No. 4 (2011), 303-324.

DOI: 10.1108/09513551111133470

Google Scholar

[11] E. Loeffler, Quality awards as a public sector benchmarking concept in OECD member countries: some guidelines for quality award organisers, Public Administration and Development, Vol. 21 No. 1 (2001), 27-40.

DOI: 10.1002/pad.167

Google Scholar

[12] P. Haynes, Managing Complexity in the Public Services, Open University Press, London, (2003).

Google Scholar

[13] B. Schneider, The people make the place, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 40 (1987), 437-53.

Google Scholar

[14] B.M. Staw, J. Ross, J., Stability in the midst of change: a dispositional approach to job attitudes, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 70 (1985), 469-480.

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.469

Google Scholar