Technological Entrepreneurship: Success Factors as Perceived by Potential Young Entrepreneurs

Article Preview

Abstract:

This research paper aims to propose and empirically test a theoretical model, positing relationships among entrepreneur, technology and resources. The applied methodology was completing a questionnaire survey by a random sample of undergraduate management and engineering students across five Romanian faculties. The results were based on structural equation modeling analysis. Results provide strong support for the proposition that the success of a good business idea strongly depends on some factors, including the capabilities of an entrepreneur, on the technology used to implement the idea and on the necessary resources. The paper demonstrates that the success of an idea in technological entrepreneurship, based on the potential young entrepreneurs point of view is influenced by the characteristics of the young entrepreneur, by his capabilities and his knowledge. The success is also influenced in some proportions by the innovation of technology, its development and globalization. The third category of the success factors is resources, which includes temporal resources, material resources, financial resources and informational resources. The conclusion of this research is that the most important factor for a successful business idea is the entrepreneur.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

639-644

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.B. Say, Traité D'économie Politique, Institut Coppet, Paris, 1803.

Google Scholar

[2] F.H. Knight 1921, Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Hart, Schaffner, and Marx Prize Essays, no. 31. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin.

Google Scholar

[3] I.M. Kirzner, Competition and entrepreneurship, Mountain, US, (1973).

Google Scholar

[4] Ghenea, M. (2011). Antreprenoriat: drumul de la idee la oportunitate si succes in afaceri. Bucuresti, Romania: Universul Juridic.

Google Scholar

[5] P.R. Abetti, Planning and building the infrastructure for technological entrepreneurship, International Journal of Technology Managementc, 7(1-2) (1992) 129-139.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Kenney, U. Von Burgh, Techology, entrepreneuship and path dependence: Industrial clustering in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1), 1999, pp.67-103.

DOI: 10.1093/icc/8.1.67

Google Scholar

[7] G. Zhang, P. Xuebing, J. Li, Technological entrepreneurship and policy environment: A case of China, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(4), (2008) 733-751.

DOI: 10.1108/14626000810917834

Google Scholar

[8] J. Yu, R. Stough, P. Nijkamp, Governing technological entrepreneurship in China and the West, Public Administration Review, 69(s1), 2009, S95-S100.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02095.x

Google Scholar

[9] B. Antoncic, I. Prodan, Alliances, corporate technological entrepreneurship and firm performance: Testing a model on manufacturing firms, Technovation, 28 (2008) 257-265.

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.005

Google Scholar

[10] C. Petti, Cases in technological entrepreneurship: Converting ideas into value. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, (2009).

Google Scholar

[11] R.C. Dorf, T.H. Byers, Technology ventures: From idea to enterprise, McGraw-Hill, New York, (2005).

Google Scholar

[12] K. Suzuki, K. Sang-Hoon, B. Zong-Tae, Entrepreneurship in Japan and Silicon Valey: A comparative study. Technovation, 22, (2002) 595-606.

Google Scholar

[13] B.J. Bird, Entrepreneurial Behaviour, London: Scott, Foresman, (1989).

Google Scholar

[14] J.A. Schumpeter, History of economic analysis, Oxford University Press, New York, (1954).

Google Scholar

[15] G.T. Lumpkin, G.G. Dess, Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21 (1996) 135-172.

DOI: 10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568

Google Scholar

[16] T.S. Schweizer, The psychology of novelty seeking. Creativity and innovation: Neurocognitive aspects in a work-psychological perspective, Creatvity and Innovation Management, 15(2) (2006) 164-172.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00383.x

Google Scholar

[17] T. Kollman, A. Kucketz, C. Stockmann, E-Entrepreneurship and ICT ventures: strategy, organisation and technology. Hershey, Business Science Reference, New York, (2010).

Google Scholar

[18] H. Mintzberg, B. Ahlstrad, J Lampel, Strategy Safary: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management, The Free Press, New York, (1998).

Google Scholar

[19] Eurostat – Statistical Books. Entrepreneurship determinants: culture and capabilities, Publication Office of the European Union, Luxemburg, (2012).

Google Scholar

[20] X. Chen, X. Yao, S. Kotha, Entrepreneur passion and preparedness in business plan presentations: a persuasion analysis of venture capitalists' funding decisions, The Academy of Management Journal, 52(1) (2009) 199-214.

DOI: 10.5465/amj.2009.36462018

Google Scholar

[21] H.Y. Hurt, K. Joseph, C.D. Cook, Scales for the measurement of innovativeness, Human Communication Research, 4(1), 1977, p.58–65.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00597.x

Google Scholar

[22] D.F. Midgley, G.R. Dowling, Innovativeness: the concept and its measurement, Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 1978, pp.229-242.

Google Scholar

[23] P. Hirst, G. Thompson, Globalization in question, Polity Press, Cambridge, (1996).

Google Scholar

[24] H. H. Stevenson, A perspective on entrepreneurship, Harvard Business School Working Paper 9-384-131, (1983).

Google Scholar

[25] J. C. Jarillo-Mossi, Entrepreneurship and growth: The strategic art of external resources, Journal of Business Venturing, 4 (1989) 133-147.

DOI: 10.1016/0883-9026(89)90027-x

Google Scholar