Empirical Determination of Roughness Parameters Using Wiper Tool Inserts in Finish Turning of AISI 4140

Article Preview

Abstract:

The surface finishing resulting from metal cutting processes is associated with the surface texture and integrity. Texture can be quantified by roughness parameters as Roughness Average (Ra), Total Roughness (Rt), Maximum Surface Depth (Ry) and Surface Depth (Rz) which are directly related to cutting magnitudes and tool characteristics. This work assesses empirically the roughness generated by wiper cutting tools in dry finishing turning operations of AISI 4140 steel. By keeping a constant cutting speed and using depths of cut greater than 2/3 of the cutting tool radius (rε), four feed rates (f) are used with three rε, both combined in a way to ascertain the equations which allows the evaluation of Ra, Rt, Ry and Rz values. In order to determine the equations for roughness prediction a multiple linear regression method in function of f and rε is applied, showing good agreement with experimental results. Also, achieved results allows to prove the effectiveness of wiper tools to generate excellent surface finish without grinding operations and consequently showing that its use can increase significantly the material removal rate without compromising the surface roughness in high feed rate operations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

929-933

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. R. Thomas, Rough Surface,. London, Longman, 1982, 261p.

Google Scholar

[2] J. P. Davim, Machining: Fundamentals and Recent Advances, London, Springer-Verlag, 2008, 361p.

Google Scholar

[3] X. He, S. Wu, and H. Kratz, Forces in hard turning of 51CrV4 with wiper cutting tool, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 5, p.501–506, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/s1007-0214(06)70226-7

Google Scholar

[4] F. Klocke, Manufacturing Processes 1: Cutting, RWTH Aachen. Springer, 2011, 522p.

Google Scholar

[5] W. Grzesik and T. Wanat, Surface finish generated in hard turning of quenched alloy steel parts using conventional and wiper ceramic inserts, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing., vol. 46, no. 15, p.1988–1995, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.009

Google Scholar

[6] E. A. Correia and J. P. Davim, Surface roughness measurement in turning carbon steel AISI 1045 using wiper inserts, Measurement, vol. 44, no. 5, p.1000–1005, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2011.01.018

Google Scholar

[7] V. P. Astakhov, Geometry of Single Point Turning Tools and Drills – Fundamentals and Practical Applications,. Heidelberg, Springer, 2010, 565p.

Google Scholar

[8] G. T. Smith, Cutting Tool Technology, London, Springer, 2008, 600p.

Google Scholar

[9] Sandvik, Metal Cutting Technical Guide – General Turning, Sandvik Coromant, 2012, 156p.

Google Scholar

[10] ISO 4287, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS), Surface Texture: Profile Method, Terms, Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters, 1997, 25p.

DOI: 10.3403/30398213u

Google Scholar

[11] W. P. Silva and C. M. D. P. S. Silva, LAB Fit Curve Fitting Software, Nonlinear Regression and Treatment of Data Program, V 7. 2. 47 (1999-2010). In: www. labfit. net.

Google Scholar