Constitutive Modeling of Advanced High Strength Steels Characterized by Uniaxial and Biaxial Experiments

Sansot Panich

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.849.207

Paper Titles

Polyethylene Glycol-Coated Polyimide-Based Probe with Neural Recording IC for Chronic Neural Recording
p.183

Silicon-Based Multichannel Probe Integrated with a Front End Low Power Neural Recording IC for Acute Neural Recording
p.189

Modeling of Flow Curve at High Temperature for a Ti-6Al-4V Alloy
p.195

Determination of Damage Criterion Using a Hybrid Analysis for Advanced High Strength Steel
p.200

Constitutive Modeling of Advanced High Strength Steels Characterized by Uniaxial and Biaxial Experiments
p.207

Magnetocaloric Effect of LaFe_11.5Si_1.5C_0.2 Sinters Prepared by SPS Process
p.212

Materials for Extension Low-Income Housing: The Case of Bang Bua Community in Bangkok, Thailand
p.218

Weibull Analysis of the Effect of Interrupted Aging Treatments on the Fatigue Life of Components Made of Cast Aluminium Alloy 354
p.223

Experimental Testing of the Weathering Steel Road Bridge in Ostrava
p.228

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 849Constitutive Modeling of Advanced High Strength...

Constitutive Modeling of Advanced High Strength Steels Characterized by Uniaxial and Biaxial Experiments

Abstract:

Anisotropic plastic behavior of advanced high strength steel sheets of grade DP780 and DP980 were investigated using three different yield functions, namely, the von Mises, Hills 48 and Barlat2000 (Yld2000-2d) criteria. Uniaxial tensile and balanced biaxial (hydraulic bulge) tests were conducted for the examined steels in order to characterize flow behavior and plastic anisotropy for different stress states. Additionally, disk compression and In-plane biaxial tension tests were performed for obtaining balanced r-value of DP780 and DP980, respectively. All these data were used to determine the anisotropic coefficients. According to the different yield criteria, yield stresses and r-values for different directions were calculated corresponding to these yield criteria. The results were compared with experimental data. It was found that the Yld2000-2d model precisely predict well with experimental data than the other models.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 849)

Pages:

207-211

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.849.207

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2013

Authors:

Sansot Panich

Keywords:

Biaxial Tests, Constitutive Model, DP Steel, Uniaxial Test, Yield Function

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] R. von Mises: Göttinger Nachrichten Math. Phys. Klasse (1913), pp.582-592.

Google Scholar

[2] R. Hill, in: Proceeding of Royal Society, London, A193 (1948), pp.281-297.

Google Scholar

[3] F. Barlat, J.C. Brem, J. W. Yoon, K. Chung, R.E. Dick, D.J. Lege, F. Pourboghart, S.H. Choi and E. Chu: Int. J. of Plast. Vol. 19 (2003), pp.1297-1319.

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(02)00019-0

Google Scholar

[4] S. Panich, V. Uthaisangsuk, S. Suranuntchai, S. Jirathearanat: Adv. Mater. Res. Vol. 410 (2012) pp.232-235.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Panich, V. Uthaisangsuk, S. Suranuntchai, S. Jirathearanat: Key Eng. Mater. Vol. 504-506 (2012), pp.89-94.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.504-506.89

Google Scholar

[6] S. Panich, F. Barlat, V. Uthaisangsuk, S. Suranantchai, S. Jirathearanat: Mater. Des. Vol. 51 (2013), pp.756-766.

Google Scholar

[7] S.N. Kim, J.W. Lee, F. Barlat, M.G. Lee: J. Mater. Proc. Tech. Vol. 213 (2013), p.1929-(1942).

Google Scholar

[8] L. Xu and F. Barlat, in: Proceeding of 9th Int. Conf. on Tech. of Plast. ICTP'08, Gyeongju, Korea (2008), pp.2312-2317.

Google Scholar

[9] L. Xu and F. Barlat, in: Proceeding of 17th Int. Sym. on Plast. & its curr. appli. PLASTICITY'11 Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (2011), pp.229-231.

Google Scholar