Polyethylene Glycol-Coated Polyimide-Based Probe with Neural Recording IC for Chronic Neural Recording

Article Preview

Abstract:

Neural probe array is utilized in neural recording, in the aim to understand the neural activity. Silicon is the common substrate used in neural probe array. However, due to the rigid nature, the silicon-based neural probe array causes cell damage during implantation into the brain tissue. This would reduce the signal-to-noise ratio. Therefore, flexible polymer probe is more suitable as it can help to minimize the tissue damage and thus increasing the signal-to-noise ratio. The lack of stiffness for the flexible probe is solved by coating it with polyethylene glycol (PEG). It stiffens the probe and can be dissolved in water, which allows the polymer probe to regain its flexibility. The proposed integrated probe with reduced distance between probe and ASIC will further help to improve the signal-to-noise ratio during neural recording. The coated flexible probe regained original impedance of 14.1 kΩ at a frequency of 1 kHz. A bench-top neural recording with the flexible probe array in saline solution will also be acquired.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

183-188

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. C. Hoogerwerf and K. D. Wise, A three-dimensional microelectrode array for chronic neural recording, Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 41, pp.1136-1146, (1994).

DOI: 10.1109/10.335862

Google Scholar

[2] S. Kim, R. Bhandari, M. Klein, S. Negi, L. Rieth, P. Tathireddy, M. Toepper, H. Oppermann, and F. Solzbacher, Integrated wireless neural interface based on the Utah electrode array, Biomedical Microdevices, vol. 11, pp.453-466, (2009).

DOI: 10.1007/s10544-008-9251-y

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Ying, M. Ning Gulari, James A. Wiler and K.D. Wise, A Microassembled Low-Profile Three-Dimensional Microelectrode Array for Neural Prosthesis Applications, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, , vol. 16, pp.977-988, (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/jmems.2007.896712

Google Scholar

[4] Vadim S. Polikov, Patrick A. Tresco and William M. Reichert, Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 148, pp.1-18, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.08.015

Google Scholar

[5] T. Stieglitz, H. Beutel, M. Schuettler and J. -Uwe Meyer, Micromachined, Polyimide-Based Devices for Flexible Neural Interfaces, Biomedical Microdevices, vol. 2, pp.283-294, (2000).

DOI: 10.1023/a:1009955222114

Google Scholar

[6] S. Kisban, S. Herwik, K. Seidl, B. Rubehn, A. Jezzini, M. A. Umilt@, L. Fogassi, Ti Stieglitz, O. Paul and P. Ruther, Microprobe Array with Low Impedance Electrodes and Highly Flexible Polyimide Cables for Acute Neural Recording, in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007. EMBS 2007. 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2007, pp.175-178.

DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2007.4352251

Google Scholar

[7] W. Jensen, U. G. Hofmann, K. Yoshida, Assessment of subdural insertion force of single-tine microelectrodes in rat cerebral cortex, in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2003. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2003, pp.2168-2171.

DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2003.1280170

Google Scholar