Weighting Method of Indicators for Safety Management System Assessment

Article Preview

Abstract:

Safety management system assessment (SMSA) was a hot point in the field of safety management practice and research. But, the weights of safety management system assessment indicators are different in former achievements. In this study, the scores of indicators in ISRS, NOSA, API and Basic Norms for Work Safety Standardization (BNWSS) were referenced to obtain the initial weights of the primary indicators for SMSA. The decision-makers preference for the four methods was settled by means of analytic hierarchy process (AHP). After Kendalls test for consistency of the four methods, the combination weighting was made considering the preference and consistence on the basis of AHP. The rationality of weighting result was evaluated with close degree. The close degree reached 91.0% which was satisfactory.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 850-851)

Pages:

1020-1023

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C.M. Tam, I.W.H. Fung, A.P.C. Chan: Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 19 (2001), pp.393-403.

Google Scholar

[2] K. Frick: Safety Science, Vol. 49 (2011), pp.974-987.

Google Scholar

[3] E. Bottani, L. Monica and G. Vignali: Safety Science, Vol. 47 (2009), pp.155-162.

Google Scholar

[4] E. Sgourou, P. Katsakiori, S. Goutsos, et al: Safety Science Vol. 48 (2010), pp.1019-1025.

Google Scholar

[5] K. Øien, I.B. Utne and I.A. Herrera: Safety Science Vol. 49 (2011) no. 2, pp.148-161.

Google Scholar

[6] K. Øien, I.B. Utne, R.K. Tinmannsvik, et al: Safety Science, vol. 49 (2011) no. 2, pp.162-171.

Google Scholar

[7] G.X. Song and D.L. Yang: Systems Engineering and Electronics, Vol. 26 (2004) no. 9, pp.1226-1230, 1290.

Google Scholar

[8] X.X. Lu and Y.T. Huang: Jiangsu Education Research, (2010) no. 5, pp.47-48.

Google Scholar