Application of Anaerobic Fermentation Technology in Prevent and Control Pollution of Livestock and Poultry

Abstract:

Analysis different kinds of anaerobic fermentation technology using in prevent and control of livestock and poultry. Comparing removal rate of COD, total Nitrogen, total Phosphorus of Mixed anaerobic fermentation technology (CSTR), upflow sludge bed reactor (USR) and simple anaerobic pool. Removal rate of CSTR and USR is obvious better than simple an aerobic pool, and removal rate is proportional to the pollutant concentration. Overall evaluations of investment, occupation of land and rate. Points out the problems exist in the using of anaerobic fermentation technology and put forward reasonable suggestions.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 850-851)
• Pages: 1176-1179
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.850-851.1176
• Online since: December 2013
• Authors: Yu Kun Ji, Hong He
• Keywords: Anaerobic Fermentation Technology, Mixed Anaerobic Fermentation Technology, Simple Anaerobic Pool, Upflow Sludge Bed Reactor

References

[1] B.L. Zhao, F. Wang, T. Wang, et al: China Animal Industry, vol. 11 (2007), 76-77. (In Chinese).

[2] Q. Zhou: China biogas. vol. 28 (2009) no. 1, pp.34-36. (In Chinese).

[3] J. Du, Z. Z. Chang, S.M. Wang et al: Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, vol. 35 (2008) no. 1, pp.225-227. (In Chinese).

[4] X.H. Chen, H.G. Zhu: Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. vol. 23 (2007) no. 3, pp.279-283. (In Chinese).

[5] S.J. Wu, S.Y. Liu, X.D. Wang: China biogas, vol. 26 (2008) no. 4, pp.20-23. (In Chinese).

[6] G.M. Zhao, Y.X. Qiao: Agriculture & Technology, vol. 27 (2007) no. 4, pp.80-81. (In Chinese).

[7] D. Li, W. Gu: Shandong Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, vol. 159 (2010) no. 4, pp.67-68. (In Chinese).