Experimental Study on Influence of Fly Ash on Mercury Removal in Flue Gas with UV Light

Article Preview

Abstract:

The original fly ash samples fetched from the power plant and the treated fly ash samples after screening, magnetic separation and mixing were used in the experiment of photocatalytic removal on mercury in flue gas. The fly ash samples and the absorption solution after experiment were tested for mercury content. The results showed that different sizes of the original fly ash had different characteristics of photocatalytic removal of mercury. The adsorption of mercury by fly ash was an important condition for the occurrence of photocatalytic effect. When the mercury adsorption capacity of fly ash was stronger, the capacity of photocatalytic removal mercury was also greater. The presence of iron oxide on the fly ash surface can promote the capability of photocatalytic removal of mercury by fly ash. The presence of ultraviolet light can significantly promote Hg0 oxidize to Hg2+ by fly ash. Thus the oxidized mercury in the flue gas can be easily absorbed by the solution.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 864-867)

Pages:

1546-1551

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Pacyna,E. G, Pacyna J.M., Sundseth,K., Munthe, J. et al. Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projection to 2020. Atmospheric Environment. 2010, 44(20):2487-2499.

DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.009

Google Scholar

[2] Pudasainee D., Kin J.H., Seo Y.C. mercury emission trend influenced by stringent air pollutants regulation for coal-fire power plants in Korea. Atmospheric Enviroment. 2009, 43: 6254-6259.

DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.007

Google Scholar

[3] Air pollutant emission standards of Thermal power plant, GB 13223-2011, Chinese National Standard, (2011).

Google Scholar

[4] Wang Peng, Wu Jiang, Ren Jian Xing, Zhang Jinhong, Fang Jihui, Shi Zhou, Experimental Study on Influence of Unburned Carbon in Fly Ash on Mercury Adsorption in Flue Gas , Journal of Power Engineering, 2012, 32(4): 332-337. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Wu Chengjun,Duan Yufeng,Zhao Changsui. Adsorption Characterization of Mercury by Fly Ashes During Co-combustion of Sludge and Coal,China Electrical Engineering,2008,28(14):55-60. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] Carey T. R., et al., Enhanced Control of Mercury in wet FGD systems, Presented at the first Joint DOE_PETC power and Fuel Systems Contractors Conference, U. S department of Energy, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996: 9-11.

Google Scholar

[7] Grant E. Dunham, et al., Fixed-bed Studies of the Interactions between Mercury and Coal Combustion Fly Ash, Fuel Processing Technology, 2003, 82(2): 197-213.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(03)00070-5

Google Scholar

[8] Thomas K. Gale, Bruce W. Lani, George R. Offen, Mechanisms governing the fate of mercury in coal-fired power systems, Fuel Processing Technology, 2008, 89: 139-151.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.08.004

Google Scholar

[9] Yeon-tae Yu,Preparation of nanocrystalline TiO2-coated coal fly ash and effect of iron oxides in coal fly ash on photocatalytic activity[J], Powder Technology, 2004, 146(2004): 154-159.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2004.06.006

Google Scholar