Physiological Variation of Tea Plant under Mercury Stress

Hua Bin Xiong; Chang Qun Duan; Kai Yan; Feng He; Deng Gao Fu; Ming Zhi Liang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.864-867.205

Paper Titles

Study on the Effect of Infrared-Withering on the Quality of Oolong Tea
p.184

Influence of Nitrogen Nutrients on Hyperaccumulation of Sedum alfredii Hance under Complex Heavy Metals Stress
p.190

Kinetics of CO₂ Absorption in MEA+DETA Blended Amine Solutions
p.194

Effect of Nitrate on Inducement of Denitrifying Phosphate-Accumulating Organisms
p.201

Physiological Variation of Tea Plant under Mercury Stress
p.205

Isolation and Degradation Kinetics of the Quinoline Degradation Bacterium Strains from Coking Wastewater
p.209

Supercritical CO₂ Extraction of Plumula nelumbinis Oil Rich in γ-Sitosterol Using Response Surface Methodology
p.213

Organic Complex Chelators for Stabilization of Heavy Metals in Fly Ash
p.217

Optimization of the Heterologous Expression of Sesuvium portulacastrum Betaine Aldehyde Dehydrogenase in Escherichia coli
p.221

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 864-867Physiological Variation of Tea Plant under Mercury...

Physiological Variation of Tea Plant under Mercury Stress

Abstract:

Environment pollution from mercury is very serious because of widespread use in many fields, and physiological characteristics change can reflect stress response of plant in many times. In the research various content of mercury added artificial into tea plant soil and then relative physiological traits were detected to discuss differential characteristics of tea plant to mercury stress. The results showed that in different Hg concentration stress chlorophyll content of YK and ZJ were decline, and MDA content of YK, FX and MH also express ascend situation, but their proline content were decline than ones of control. As a word, heavy metal Hg resistance of YK is lowest in five materials, but resistance of FX was higher than other materials.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 864-867)

Pages:

205-208

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.864-867.205

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2013

Authors:

Hua Bin Xiong, Chang Qun Duan*, Kai Yan, Feng He, Deng Gao Fu, Ming Zhi Liang

Keywords:

Mercury Stress, Physiological Characteristics, Response, Tea Plant

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] H.Q. Hao, G.X. Shi, K.H. Du and Q.S. Xu. Journal of Lake Sciences, Vol. 2 (2001), pp.163-168.

Google Scholar

[2] Fox C. D, Changey R. L and Whitem C. Annu Rev Plant Physio, Vol. 29 (1978), pp.511-566.

Google Scholar

[3] Sutton, D. J., Tchounwou, P. B., Ninashvili, N. and Shen, E. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Vol. 3 (2002), pp.965-984.

Google Scholar

[4] B. Mu, S.H. Hang, Y.H. Zhang and Q Zou. Chinese Journal of Microecology, Vol. 19 (2007), pp.112-113.

Google Scholar

[5] P.B. Ning K.K. Guo J.Y. Wang and Y. M Zhang. Food Science, Vol. 31 (2010), pp.150-153.

Google Scholar

[6] M.Z. Liang, Y.Y. Li, W. Ma, P.S. Wang, L.F. Xia, L. Han, L. Cai, P.Z. Ji and H.J. Zhou. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol. 23 (2010), pp.119-122.

Google Scholar

[7] Zhang, H., Feng, X., Larssen, T., Shang, L. and Li, P. Environmental science & technology, Vol. 44(2010), pp.4499-4504.

Google Scholar

[8] Wang, Y. and Greger, M. Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol. 33(2004), pp.1779-1785.

Google Scholar

[9] Anjum, N. A., Ahmad, I., Válega, M., Pacheco, M., Figueira, E., Duarte, A. C. and Pereira, E. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, Vol. 222(2011), pp.1-15.

DOI: 10.1007/s11270-011-0799-4

Google Scholar

[10] Monni, S., Uhlig, C., Junttila, O. Hansen, E. and Hynynen, J. Environmental Pollution, Vol. 112 (2001), pp.417-426.

DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(00)00139-1

Google Scholar

[11] Chaoui, A. and El Ferjani, E. Comptes rendus biologies, Vol. 328 (2005), pp.23-31.

DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2004.10.001

Google Scholar

[12] Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P. and Teare, I. D. Plant and soil, Vol. 39 (1973), pp.205-207.

Google Scholar

[13] Zengin, F. K. and Munzuroglu, O. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica, Vol. 47(2005), pp.157-164.

Google Scholar