Carbon Emissions Reducing Mechanisms on Integrated Process Parameter Optimization and Scheduling Problem Considering Makespan and Carbon Emissions

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper develops an integrated process parameter optimization and scheduling problem, where process parameter optimization and flow shop scheduling are considered simultaneously. Two objectives are taken into account: minimize makespan and carbon emissions. Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm is adopted to handle such a problem. Then, the researchers propose two carbon emission reducing mechanisms to optimize the scheduling results: postponing mechanism, and process parameter preliminary optimization (PPPOM) mechanism. There are four cases depending on whether or not mechanisms are employed. The effects of those mechanisms on minimum objective functions, number of non-dominated solutions and quality of non-dominated solutions are studied. The results indicate that those mechanisms have significant influence on the optimization results. Better non-dominated solutions are produced when more mechanisms are employed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 869-870)

Pages:

1015-1023

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Yan, J., and Li, L.: Multi-objective optimization of milling parameters – the trade-offs between energy, production rate and cutting quality', Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, ", (0), pp.1-10.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.030

Google Scholar

[2] Qian, B., Wang, L., Hu, R., Wang, W. -L., Huang, D. -X., and Wang, X.: A hybrid differential evolution method for permutation flow-shop scheduling, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008, 38, (7-8), pp.757-777.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-007-1115-8

Google Scholar

[3] Luo, H., Du, B., Huang, G.Q., Chen, H., and Li, X.: Hybrid flow shop scheduling considering machine electricity consumption cost', Int J Prod Econ, 2013, ", (0), pp.1-17.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.01.028

Google Scholar

[4] Mouzon, G., Yildirim, M.B., and Twomey, J.: Operational methods for minimization of energy consumption of manufacturing equipment, International Journal of Production Research, 2007, 45, (18-19), pp.4247-4271.

DOI: 10.1080/00207540701450013

Google Scholar

[5] Mouzon, G., and Yildirim, M.B.: A framework to minimise total energy consumption and total tardiness on a single machine, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 2008, 1, (2), pp.105-116.

DOI: 10.1080/19397030802257236

Google Scholar

[6] Zhang, L., Li, X., Gao, L., and Zhang, G.: Dynamic rescheduling in FMS that is simultaneously considering energy consumption and schedule efficiency, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013, pp.1-13.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-013-4867-3

Google Scholar

[7] Fang, K., Uhan, N., Zhao, F., and Sutherland, J.W.: A new approach to scheduling in manufacturing for power consumption and carbon footprint reduction, J Manuf Syst, 2011, 30, (4), pp.234-240 %\ 2012-2012-2010 2013: 2050: (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2011.08.004

Google Scholar

[8] Li, C., Tang, Y., Cui, L., and Li, P.: A quantitative approach to analyze carbon emissions of CNC-based machining systems, J Intell Manuf, 2013, pp.1-12.

DOI: 10.1007/s10845-013-0812-4

Google Scholar

[9] NDRC: 2011 Baseline Emission Factors for Regional Power Grids in China, (2011).

Google Scholar

[10] Liu, F.: Energy performance of mechanical processing system and application, (Machinery Industry Press, 1995. 1995).

Google Scholar

[11] Shaonong, M.: Machinery Processing Technical Handbook, (Machinery Industry Press, 1992. 1992).

Google Scholar

[12] Rajemi, M.F., Mativenga, P.T., and Aramcharoen, A.: Sustainable machining: selection of optimum turning conditions based on minimum energy considerations, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010, 18, (10), pp.1059-1065.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.025

Google Scholar

[13] Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on, 2002, 6, (2), pp.182-197.

DOI: 10.1109/4235.996017

Google Scholar