Application of the Mean-Variance Theory and Resampling Technique for the Italian Energy Portfolio Settlement

Abstract:

The energy planning based on Mean - Variance theory, guides the investors in investment decisions, trying to maximize the return and minimize the risk of investment. However, this theory is based on strong hypotheses and, in addition, input data are often affected by estimation errors. Moreover, this theory determines poor diversification increasing return and risk of the portfolio, and strong variability of the outputs when inputs are varied.In the first part of the paper, the Mean - Variance theory was applied to the energy generation in Italy; in particular, the analysis was on the actual energy mix, but also assuming the use of nuclear technology and taking into account verisimilar improvement, of technologies in the future.On the other hand, in the second part of the paper, a methodology has been applied in order to limit the problems of Mean-Variance theory applied to the energy mix settlement. In particular, the input variables have been calculated using Monte Carlo simulation, in order to reduce the estimation error, and the Resampled Efficiency ^TM technique has been applied in order to calculate the resulting new “average” efficient frontier. This methodology has been applied either not limiting or limiting the minimum and maximum percentage for every energy generation technology, in order to simulate constraints due, for example, to the technological characteristics of the plant, the availability of the sources and eventually to norms, to the territorial characteristics and to the socio-political choices. The application of Mean - Variance theory allowed to obtain energy portfolio, alternative to the actual, characterized by higher values of expected returns an lower values of risk.It was also shown that the application of the Resampled Efficiency ^TM technique with data originated with the Monte Carlo simulation effectively tackles the problems of Mean - Variance theory; in this way, the decision maker is helped in making decisions in the energy system policy and development.Thanks to this approach, applied in particular to the Italian energy contest, it was also possible to evaluate the effectiveness of the introduced modifications to the Italian actual energy mix to achieve the 2020 European Energy Directive targets in particular concerning the reduction of CO₂ levels.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 869-870)
• Pages: 581-592
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.869-870.581
• Online since: December 2013
• Authors: Mauro Arnesano, Antonio Paolo Carlucci*, Giovanni D'Oria, Alessio Guadalupi, Domenico Laforgia
• Keywords: Energy Mix, Energy Planning, Environmental sustainability, Mean-Variance Portfolio Theory, Resampled Efficiency Techniques, Shimon Awerbuch

References

[1] Markowitz HM. Portfolio Selection., The Journal of Finance (1), 77-91, (1952).

[2] Markowitz HM. Portfolio Selection Efficient diversification of investment. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York Chapman & Hall, Limited, London (1959).

[3] Awerbuch, S. and Berger, M. Applying Portfolio Theory to EU Electricity Planning and Policy-Making., IEA/EET Working Paper, Report Number EET/2003/03, (2003).

[4] Awerbuch, S. and Yang S. Efficient electricity generating portfolios for Europe: maximizing energy security and climate change mitigation., EIB Papers 12 (2), (2007).

[5] Michaud RO. Efficient Asset Management: A Practical Guide to Stock Portfolio Optimization and Asset Allocation. Second edition Oxford (1998).

[6] Michaud R. and Michaud R. Estimation Error And Portfolio Optimization: A Resampling Solution., Journal Of Investment Management 6 (1), 8-28, (2008).

[7] Chen, Z. and Epstein, L. Ambiguity, Risk, and Asset Returns in Continuous Time., Econometrica 70 (4), 1403-1443, (2002).

DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00337

[8] Arnesano, M., Carlucci, A.P., Corallo, A., D'Oria, G. and Pasimeni, F. Extension of portfolio theory application to the problem of energy planning., Proceedings of SEEP 2010 Conference, June 29th – July 2nd, Bari, ITALY.

[9] Arnesano, M., Carlucci, A.P. and Laforgia, D. Extension of portfolio theory application to energy planning problem – the Italian case, Energy 39, 112-124, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.053

[10] Berlin, W.J. Portfolio Resampling and Efficiency Issues., Master Thesis Humboldt-Universitätzu Berlin School of Business and Economics Spandauer Str. 1 D-10178 Berlin, (2003).

[11] Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC.

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511664885.044

[12] Meola, A. and Polidoro, F. Caratteristiche di costo e di esercizio degli impianti di generazione alimentati da fonti fossili, rinnovabili, assimilate, di cogenerazione e di generazione distribuita., CESI: Centro Elettrotecnico Sperimentale Italiano 2004. Rapporto A4-523749.

DOI: 10.22541/au.161437486.64628806/v1

[13] CO2 Emission: Graphic and Historical Data (2008-2012). The Exchange of SENDECO2.

[14] EU European Commission. External Cost: Research results on socio-environmental damages due to electricity and transport. European Commission (2003).

[15] Desiata, L. and D'Alberti, F. Il ruolo del nucleare nell'ottimizzazione dei portafogli base-load., ENERGIA 28 (2), 60-68, (2007).

[16] Madlener, R. and Wenk, C. Efficient Investment Portfolios for the Swiss Electricity Supply Sector. "Proceedings of UK ERC Workshop 2008, 9-10 July; St. Anne, s College, Oxford, UK.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1620417

[17] Idzorek T.M. (2004). A step-by-step guide to the Black-Litterman model, incorporating user-specified confidence level.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3479867

[18] Mankert C. (2006). The Black-Litterman Model - mathematical and behavioral finance approaches towards its use in practice,. Licentiate thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.