A Theme-Based and Network Coupled Framework for Quantatitive Indicators Selection in Ecological Construction: A Case Study in Fujian, China

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is important to build a scientific and effective indicator system for the assessment and management of regional ecological construction. A theme-based and network coupled framework provides a useful approach to solve some problems in establishing indicator systems, such as lack of systematic study on indicators connotation and non-transparent processes of indicators selection. Based on the ecological construction practice in Fujian province, China, this paper (1) analyzed the main challenges of the ecological construction,implementation and development processes, summarized the currently main themes for ecological construction, and built a theme-based indicators framework; (2) established indicators selection criteria matrix and alternative indicators matrix by using network analysis method; (3) built a multi-objective selection model considering the economic cost, social effect and ecological integrity by genetic algorithm to quantitatively select operational indicators of ecological construction. Our study will contribute to deeply understanding the connotation and improving the science and validity of the ecological indicators system for ecological construction assessment and management applications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 869-870)

Pages:

726-731

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Ma, S.J., Wang, R.S. The Social-economic-natural Complex Ecosystem. Acta Ecol. 1(1984), pp.1-9.

Google Scholar

[2] Guan, Y.Z. Study on the Index System for Constructing Ecological—a Case Study on Fujian Province. Journal of Fujian Teachers University (Natural Science). 4(2002), pp.100-104.

Google Scholar

[3] Bian, Y.S., He, J. The Study on Standards of Ecological, Eco-city and Eco-county. Engineering Science. 11(2003), pp.22-28.

Google Scholar

[4] State Environment Protection Administration of China. The National Plan for Ecological Environment Construction. Beijing (1998).

Google Scholar

[5] State Environment Protection Administration of China. Construction Indicators of Eco-county, Eco-city and Eco-province (revised). Beijing (2007).

Google Scholar

[6] Zhang, K.M., Weng, Z.G. Progress on indicators of urban ecologically sustainable development. Urban Environment& Urban Ecology. 6(2001), pp.1-4.

Google Scholar

[7] Turnhout E., Hisschemoller M., Eijsackers H. Ecological Indicators: Between the Two Fires of Science and Policy. Ecological Indicators. 7(2007), pp.215-228.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.12.003

Google Scholar

[8] Olsen LM, Dale V.H., Foster T. Landscape Patterns as Indicators of Ecological Change at Fort Benning, Georgia, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 9(2007), pp.137-149.

DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.007

Google Scholar

[9] Lin, T., Xue, X.Z., Lu, C.Y. Methods for Developing a Net Shape Ecological Indicator System and Assigning Rational Weights to the Indicators. Acta Ecol. 1(2007), pp.235-241.

Google Scholar

[10] Fu, B.J., Liu. S. L., Ma. K.M. The Contents and Methods of Integrated Ecosystem Assessment (IEA). Acta Ecol. Sin. 12(2001), pp.1885-1892.

Google Scholar

[11] Lin. T., Lin. J.Y., Cui. S.H., Cameron S. Using a Network Framework to Quantitatively Select Ecological Indicators. Ecological Indicator. 9 (2009), pp.1114-1120.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.12.009

Google Scholar

[12] Felix M., Regina H.K., Hubert W. Indicating Ecosystem Integrity – Theoretical Concepts and Environmental Requirements. Ecological Modeling. 130(2000), pp.13-23.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3800(00)00210-6

Google Scholar

[13] Niemeijer D., De Groot R.S. A Conceptual Framework for Selecting Environmental Indicator Sets. Ecological indicators. 8(2008), pp.14-25.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.11.012

Google Scholar

[14] Bondad-Reantaso M G, Prein M. Measuring the Contribution of Small-scale Aquaculture: an Assessment. Rome, FAO(2009).

Google Scholar

[15] Bowen R.E., Riley C. Socio-economic Indicators and Integrated Coastal Management. Ocean and Coastal Management 46(2003), p.299–312.

DOI: 10.1016/s0964-5691(03)00008-5

Google Scholar

[16] Lin. T., Xue. X.Z., Lu. C.Y. Analysis of Coastal Wetland Changes by using DPSIR model: a Case Study in Xiamen China. Coastal Management. 25(2007), pp.289-303.

DOI: 10.1080/08920750601169592

Google Scholar

[17] Dale V.H., Beyeler S.C. Challenges in the Development and Use of Ecological Indicators. Ecological Indicators. 1(2001), pp.3-10.

DOI: 10.1016/s1470-160x(01)00003-6

Google Scholar

[18] Lin, J.Y., Lin, T., Cui, S.H. Quantitative Selection Model of Ecological Indicators and Its Solving method. Ecological Indicator. 13 (2012), pp.294-302.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.024

Google Scholar