Using Glass Mat Thermoplastic as Automotive Bumper’s Material to Enhance Pedestrian Safety

Abstract:

The usage of softer systems in automotive bumper is a growing trend currently especially to serve the pedestrians safety function. The term softer here does refer to the bumper system’s dynamic behavior rather than its material’s flexure or tension modules. However, the usage of such softer systems would raise issues of structural integrity of the bumper during crash. There is a strong drive currently to adopt materials such as glass mat thermoplastic (GMT), high-strength sheet molding compound (SMC) for the bumper material and plastic polypropylene (PEP) for the bumper holders [1, 2, 3] in this regard. While both the GMT and SMC do enhance the pedestrian safety condition, they both show plastic deformation at crash, even in low-speed scenarios [2, 3]. The PEP holders react only as shock absorbers and act like mechanical fuses to be destroyed in car crash, preventing the main bumper from being damaged [4]. In this paper, we propose a remedy for this problem by changing the common system that the GMT and SMC materials are usually fitted at. We propose coating the bumper beam with a Rubber padding layer that eliminates the plastic strain at low-speed crash. We also examine the behavior of the PEP during such crash scenarios. We present here the results of a low-speed head-on automotive-pedestrian crash simulation scenario for these material models, using the explicit dynamics finite element code LS-DYNA within ANSYS integration setting. A simplified parameterized finite element model of the Ford Crown Victoria car’s bumper form is used in several crash simulations that are carried out to test the validity of this modified bumper system. Based on the results of these tests, we show that, applying the Rubber coating material for the GMT and SMC bumper beams eliminates the plastic stains at low-speed crash.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 875-877)
• Pages: 455-461
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.875-877.455
• Online since: February 2014
• Authors: Ahmed Z. Salem
• Keywords: Automotive Safety, Crash Simulation, Front Bumper, GMT, Material Models, SMC

References

[1] S. K. Garkhail, R. W. H. Heijenrath And T. Peijs, Mechanical Properties of Natural-Fibre-Mat-Reinforced Thermoplastics based on Flax Fibres and Polypropylene, Applied Composite Materials 7, (2000), 351–372.

DOI: 10.1177/096369359600500303

[2] R Hosseinzadeh, M M. Shokrieh, B L Lessard, Parametric study of automotive composite bumper beams subjected to low-velocity impacts, Composite Structures 68 (2005) 419–427.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.008

[3] J. Marzbanrad, M. Alijanpour, M. SaeidKiasat , Design and analysis of an automotive bumper beam in low-speed frontal crashes, Thin-Walled Structures 47, 902–911, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2009.02.007

[4] Yuxuan L, Automobile body light weighting research based on crashworthiness numerical simulation. Thesis (PhD). China: Shanghai Jiao Tong University; (2003).

[5] W. Johnson, and S.R. Reid, Metallic Energy Dissipating Systems, Applied Mechanics Review, 31 (3), pp.277-288, (1978).

[6] W. Johnson and A.C. Walton, Protection of Car Occupants in Frontal Impact with Heavy Lorries, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1 (2), pp.111-123, (1983).

DOI: 10.1016/0734-743x(83)90001-5

[7] W. Johnson and A.C. Walton, An Experimental Investigation of the Energy Dissipation of a Number of Car Bumpers under Quasi-Static Lateral Loads, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1(3), pp.301-308, (1983).

DOI: 10.1016/0734-743x(83)90024-6

[8] N. Jones, Some Phenomena in the Structural Crashworthiness Field, International Journal of Crashworthiness, 4 (4), pp.335-350, (1999).

DOI: 10.1533/cras.1999.0110

[9] A. Z. Salem, Researching Of Frontal Automotive Bumper System To Enhance Safety. IN-TECH 2011, International Conference on Innovative Technologies. Austria, Vienna, (2011).

[10] Y. Kanae, T. Sasaki and S. Shimamura, Experimental and Analytical Studies on the Drop-Impact Test with Lead-Shielded Scale Model Radioactive Shipping Casks, In Structural Impact and Crashworthiness, Davies, G. and Morton J. (Eds. ), Elsevier, New York, pp.343-354, (1984).

[11] W. Johnson and A.G. Mamalis (Eds. ) Crashworthiness of Vehicles, Mechanical Engineering Publications Limited, London (1978).

[12] G.A.O. Davies and J. Morton (Eds. ), Structural Impact and Crashworthiness. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, New York (1984).

[13] S.R. Reid (Ed. ), Metal Forming and Impact Mechanics, Pergamon Press, London, (1985).

[14] T. Wierzbicki and N. Jones (Eds. ), Structural Crashworthiness and Failure, John Wiley, New York (1989).

[15] N. Jones, Structural Impact, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1989).

[16] N. Jones and T. Wierzbicki (Eds. ), Structural Crashworthiness, Butterworths, London (1983).

[17] J.F. Carney III and S. Pothen, Energy Dissipation in Braced Cylindrical Shells, International Journal of Mechanical Science, 30 (3/4), pp.203-216 (1988).

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7403(88)90055-0

[18] S.R. Reid, C.D. Austin and R. Smith, Tubular Rings as Impact Energy Absorber, Structural Impact and Crashworthiness, Elsevier, New York, pp.555-563, (1984).

[19] M. Langseth and O.S. Hopperstand, Static and Dynamic Axial Crushing of Square Thin-Walled Aluminum Extrusions, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 18 (7/8), pp.949-968, (1996).

DOI: 10.1016/s0734-743x(96)00025-5

[20] M. Langseth, O.S. Hopperstand and T. Berstad, Crashworthiness of Aluminum Extrusions: Validation of Numerical Simulation, Effect of Mass Ratio and Impact Velocity, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 22 (8), pp.829-854, (1999).

DOI: 10.1016/s0734-743x(98)00070-0

[21] Glass Mat Reinforced Thermoplastics Processing Guide lines for SYMALIT GMT Parts, Symalit AG, CH-5600 Lenzburg/Switzerland.

[22] JJ McCluskey, FW Doherty, Sheet molding compound. Constituent Material Forms, Composite Handbook. ASM Handbook Series, 1995, p.157–60.