Discharge and Disposal of Coal Gasification Methanol Production Residue and Distribution Characteristics of PAHs in it

Article Preview

Abstract:

To determine the quantities and the treatment ways of coal gasification methanol production residues, questionnaire survey and field investigation were carried out in this research. Moreover, the distribution characteristics of PAHs in two typical residues were determined by GC-MS technique, according to USEPA8100 method. The outputs of gasifier slag and boiler ash for were 127,494 t/a and 164,850t/a, respectively, all the boiler ash and 80% of the gasifier slag would be reused for brick-making. Coal tar residue, with the yield of 480 t/a, was always delivered to coke plant for coking, which was a effective measure to save energy and solve the environmental issues caused by the storage of this residue. The results indicated that the concentration of PAHs with 5-6 aromatic rings was 905 mg/kg in coal tar residue, accounting for 9.23% of the total PAHs concentration, its Benzo (a) pyrene concentration was 160 mg/kg, making it a major health hazard. The concentration of PAHs in gasifier slag was 189mg/kg and the PAHs with 2-3 aromatic rings accounted as high as 81.41% of the total PAHs concentration, the PAHs with 5-6 aromatic rings made up only 1.1%. TheBaPeq were 322.9 mg/kg and 0.23 mg/kg for coal tar residue and gasifier slag, respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

213-218

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T. Attwood, V. Fung, W.W. Clark, Market opportunities for coal gasification in China, J Clean Prod, 11 (2003) 473-479.

DOI: 10.1016/s0959-6526(02)00068-9

Google Scholar

[2] W. Wang, H. Han, Recovery strategies for tackling the impact of phenolic compounds in a UASB reactor treating coal gasification wastewater, Bioresour Technol, 103 (2012) 95-100.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.10.002

Google Scholar

[3] L. Ma, W. Ni, Z. Li, T. Ren, Analysis of the Polygeneration System of Methanol and Electricity Based on Coal Gasification Power Engineering, 24 (2004) 451-456.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Chmielniak, M. Sciazko, Co-gasification of biomass and coal for methanol synthesis, Appl Energy, 74 (2003) 393-403.

DOI: 10.1016/s0306-2619(02)00184-8

Google Scholar

[5] W. Qin-ping, About Gasification and Natural Gas Transformation Combination Craft Production Methyl Alcohol Optimization, Coal Technology, 31 (2012) 245-247.

Google Scholar

[6] H. Gai, Y. Jiang, Y. Qian, A. Kraslawski, Conceptual design and retrofitting of the coal-gasification wastewater treatment process, Chem Eng J, 138 (2008) 84-94.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.05.032

Google Scholar

[7] K. Kapusta, K. Stańczyk, Pollution of water during underground coal gasification of hard coal and lignite, Fuel, 90 (2011) 1927-(1934).

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.11.025

Google Scholar

[8] Z. Wang, X. Xu, Z. Gong, F. Yang, Removal of COD, phenols and ammonium from Lurgi coal gasification wastewater using A2O-MBR system, J Hazard Mater, 235-236 (2012) 78-84.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.012

Google Scholar

[9] W. Wang, W. Ma, H. Han, H. Li, M. Yuan, Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of Lurgi coal gasification wastewater in a UASB reactor, Bioresour Technology, 102 (2011) 2441-2447.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.140

Google Scholar

[10] W. Zhang, J. Ma, S. Yang, T. Zhang, Y. Li, Pretreatment of Coal Gasification Wastewater by acidification Demulsion, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 14 (2006) 398-401.

DOI: 10.1016/s1004-9541(06)60090-6

Google Scholar

[11] W. Wang, H. Han, M. Yuan, H. Li, Enhanced anaerobic biodegradability of real coal gasification wastewater with methanol addition, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 22 (2010) 1868-1874.

DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(09)60327-2

Google Scholar

[12] S. Khadhar, T. Higashi, H. Hamdi, S. Matsuyama, A. Charef, Distribution of 16 EPA-priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sludges collected from nine Tunisian wastewater treatment plants J Hazard Mater, 183 (2010) 98-102.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.112

Google Scholar

[13] Information on http: /www. epa. gov/epawaste/hazard/testmethods/sw846/index. htm.

Google Scholar

[14] Information on http: /newscenter. chemall. com. cn/NewsArticleg. asp?ArticleID=267132.

Google Scholar

[15] Information on http: /www. epa. gov/iris/subst/0436. htm.

Google Scholar

[16] L. Hu, C. Ge, Y. Zhang, Application of PCA-LDA to Classify the Carcinogenicity of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Joural of Analytical Science, 23 (2007) 717-719. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[17] H. Li, J. Chen, W. Wu, X. Piao, Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in different size fractions of soil from a coke oven plant and its relationship to organic carbon content, J Hazard Mater, 176 (2010) 729-734.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.095

Google Scholar

[18] J. Dong, F. Li, K. Xie, Study on the source of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) during coal pyrolysis by PY–GC–MS, J Hazard Mater, 243 (2012) 80-85.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.09.073

Google Scholar

[19] K.F. Chang, G.C. Fang, J.C. Chen, Y.S. Wu, Atmospheric polycyclic aro-matic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Asia: A review from 1999 to 2004, Environ Pollut, 142 (2006) 388-396.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.09.025

Google Scholar

[20] C. Nisbet, P. LaGoy, Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 16 (1992) 290-230.

DOI: 10.1016/0273-2300(92)90009-x

Google Scholar