Investigations on the Mechanical Behavior of Advanced High Strength Steels Resistance Spot Welds in Cross Tension and Tensile Shear

Article Preview

Abstract:

Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS) are key materials in the conception of car body structures, permitting to reduce their weight while increasing their behavior in crash conditions. Nevertheless, the weldability of AHSS presents some particular aspects, in that complex failure types involving partial or full interfacial failure can be encountered more often than with conventional mild steels during destructive testing, despite high spot weld strength levels. This paper aims at characterizing the behavior of different AHSS spot welds under two quasi-static loading conditions, tensile shear and cross tension, often used in the automotive industry for the determination of their weldability. Interrupted cross tension and tensile shear tests were performed and spot welds failure was investigated with optical micrographs, SEM fractography and 3D-tomography in order to follow the three-dimensional crack paths due to the complex loading modes. A limited number of failure zones and damage mechanisms could be distinguished for all steel grades investigated. Moreover, numerical simulation of the tests was used to better understand the stress state in the weld and the influence of geometrical features such as weld size on the occurrence of the different failure types.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 89-91)

Pages:

130-135

Citation:

Online since:

January 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] American Welding Society: AWS D8. 1 (2007).

Google Scholar

[2] S. Zuniga, S. D. Sheppard: ASTM STP 1296 (1997), p.469.

Google Scholar

[3] Y. J. Chao: J. Eng. Mater. Technol. Vol. 125 (2003), p.125.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Nishi, T. Saito, A. Yamada and Y. Takahashi: Nippon Steel Tech. Rep. N° 20 (1982), p.37.

Google Scholar

[5] B. Naït-Oultit, A. Lens, H. Klöcker: Proc. of the Sheet Metal Welding Conference XIII (2008).

Google Scholar

[6] M. I. Khan, M. L. Kuntz and Y. Zhou: Sci. Technol. Weld. Joi. Vol. 13 (2008), p.49.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Marya and X. Q. Gayden: Weld. J. Vol. 84-s (2005), p.172.

Google Scholar

[8] W. Tao, L. Q. Li, Y. B. Chen, L. Wu: Sci. Technol. Weld. Joi. Vol. 13 (2008), p.754.

Google Scholar

[9] ISO: ISO standard 18278-2 (2004).

Google Scholar

[10] D. Radaj, Z. Zheng, W. Mohrmann: Eng. Fract. Mech. Vol. 37 (1990), p.933.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Dancette, D. Fabrègue, J. Merlin, V. Massardier and M. Bouzekri: Proc. of New Developments on Metallurgy and Applications of High Strength Steels, Buenos Aires (2008), Paper 58.

Google Scholar

[12] X. Lemoine: Proc. of the 10 th ESAFORM conference Vol. 907 (2007), p.269.

Google Scholar

[13] Abaqus Inc.: User's manual, Version 6. 5 (2004) Figure 8: DP450 - Base Metal and martensite constitutive behavior DP450 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 0. 2 0. 4 0. 6 0. 8 1 1. 2 1. 4 εp, [-] σ, [MPa] BM martensite.

Google Scholar