A Detailed Evaluation of the Effects of Bulk Residual Stress on Fatigue in Aluminum

Article Preview

Abstract:

The fully effective utilization of large aluminum forgings in aerospace structures has been hampered in the past by inadequate understanding of, and sometimes inaccurate representation of, bulk residual stresses and their impact on both design mechanical properties and structural performance. In recent years, significant advances in both computational and experimental methods have led to vastly improved characterization of residual stresses. As a result, new design approaches which require the extraction of residual stress effects from material property data and the formal inclusion of residual stresses in the design analysis, have been enabled. In particular, the impact of residual stresses on durability and damage tolerance can now be assessed, and more importantly, accounted for at the beginning of the design cycle.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 891-892)

Pages:

1205-1211

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Watton, J.D., Computational Modeling and Optimization of Bulk Residual Stress in Monolithic Aluminum Die Forgings, Residual Stress Summit, Lake Tahoe CA, September (2010).

Google Scholar

[2] Ball, D.L., and Watton, J.D., Fatigue Life Variability in Large Aluminum Forgings with Residual Stress, 52nd AIAA SDM Conference, Denver CO, April (2011).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-1867

Google Scholar

[3] Hill, M.R., The Slitting Method, in Practical Residual Stress Measurement Methods, Gary S. Schajer, Editor. ISBN: 978-1-118-34237-4, (2013).

DOI: 10.1002/9781118402832.ch4

Google Scholar

[4] Prime, M.B., and DeWald, A.T., The Contour Method, in Practical Residual Stress Measurement Methods, Gary S. Schajer, Editor. ISBN: 978-1-118-34237-4, (2013).

DOI: 10.1002/9781118402832.ch5

Google Scholar

[5] StressCheck® p-version FEA structural analysis software, Engineering Software Research and Development, Inc.

Google Scholar

[6] Dowling, N. E, Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1993, Chap. 14.

Google Scholar

[7] Ball, D.L., Limer, T.S. and Bridges, R.C. A Case Study on the Application of ICME in Aircraft Design, 53rd AIAA SDM Conference, Honolulu, HI, (2012).

Google Scholar

[8] Parker, A. P., Stress Intensity Factors, Crack Profiles, and Fatigue Crack Growth Rates in Residual Stress Fields, Residual Stress Effects in Fatigue, ASTM STP 776, (1982).

DOI: 10.1520/stp30095s

Google Scholar

[9] Nelson, D.V., Effects of Residual Stress on Fatigue Crack Propagation, Residual Stress Effects in Fatigue, ASTM STP 776, (1982).

DOI: 10.1520/stp30104s

Google Scholar

[10] Wu, X. and Carlsson, A. J, Weight Functions and Stress Intensity Factor Solutions, Pergamon Press, (1991).

Google Scholar

[11] Fett, T. and Munz, D., Stress Intensity Factors and Weight Functions, Computational Mechanics Publs, (1997).

Google Scholar

[12] Ball, D.L., The Influence of Residual Stress on the Design of Aircraft Primary Structure, Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics, 36th Vol., ASTM STP 1508, (2008).

DOI: 10.1520/stp48770s

Google Scholar

[13] Ball, D. L., A Model for the Inclusion of Notch Plasticity Effects in Fatigue Crack Growth Analysis, Fatigue Testing and Analysis Under Variable Amplitude Loading Conditions, ASTM STP 1439, (2004).

DOI: 10.1520/stp11310s

Google Scholar