The Effectiveness of Design Procedures for Fatigue Design of Welds

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper examines the link between the design codes, good design and the prevention of field failures. There are many design codes for the fatigue design of welds. They contain many differences influenced by the history of particular industries. Engineering may not be well served by these codes since on one hand they are normally conservative, thus creating excessively heavy structures. On the other hand the design codes often do not include the most important factors in the life expectancy of a weld namely the weld procedure, the quality of the weld and environmental effects. The paper concludes that a thorough review and unification of the industry design codes is overdue. The issue of manufacture of welds has to be put at the centre of the consideration of fatigue design.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 891-892)

Pages:

1513-1518

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] ASME Section IX Task Group, Metal fatigue in operating nuclear power plants, WRC Bulletin 376, November (1992).

Google Scholar

[2] British Standards 7910, Guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures, section 8 Assessment for Fatigue.

Google Scholar

[3] ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Pressure Vessels, Section VIII Division 1, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.

DOI: 10.1115/1.859872.ch21

Google Scholar

[4] S. Khoshaba, a comparison of the fatigue calculations process according to the Swedish and American textbooks for higher education, UICEE 4th Asia Pacific Forum on Engineering and Technology education, Bangkok, September (2005).

Google Scholar

[5] A. Kalnins, V. Bergsten, M. Rana, Fatigue assessment of a weld joint of a pressure vessel, Proceedings of ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference 2005, Denver, Colorado USA, PVP2005-71727.

DOI: 10.1115/pvp2005-71727

Google Scholar

[6] ASME ibid. Division 2 Alternative rules.

Google Scholar

[7] X-L. Zhao et al., Design guide for circular and rectangular hollow section welded joints under fatigue loading, CIDECT, TUV-Verlag, Germany, (2001).

Google Scholar

[8] P. Dong, Z. Cao, J.K. Hong, , Low-cycle fatigue evaluation using the weld master S-N curve, ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division conference, Vancouver, Canada, 93607, (2006).

DOI: 10.1115/pvp2006-icpvt-11-93607

Google Scholar

[9] ASME ibid, Section VIII Division 2, Tables 5. 11 and 5. 12.

Google Scholar

[10] British Standards, Code of practice for fatigue design and assessment of steel structures, BS 7608: (1993).

Google Scholar

[11] J.M. Barsom and S.T. Rolfe, Fracture and fatigue control in structures: applications of fracture mechanics, 3rd edition, ASTM MNL41, Butterworth-Heinemann, New York, 2000. Paper 10.

DOI: 10.1520/mnl10343m

Google Scholar

[12] Eurocode 3: Design Of Steel Structures - part 1-9: Fatigue. See also AS 4100.

Google Scholar

[13] Bomel Limited for the Health and Safety Executive, Comparison of fatigue provisions in codes and standards, Offshore Technology Report, 2001/83.

Google Scholar

[14] Association of American Railroads (AAR, ), Mechanical Division, Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices.

Google Scholar

[15] American Welding society, Structural Welding code- Steel, AWS D1. 1 (2000).

Google Scholar

[16] A. Berkovits et al., Consideration of effect of residual stresses on the fatigue of welded aluminium structures, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials, and Structures, 1998, 21, 159-170.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00013.x

Google Scholar

[17] W. Marshall, An assessment of the integrity of PWR pressure vessels, report by a Study Group chaired by W. Marshall, HM Stationery Office, London, UK, (1976).

Google Scholar

[18] D.O. Harris and E.Y. Lim, Applications of a fracture mechanics model of structural reliability to the effects of seismic events on reactor piping, Progress in Nuclear Energy, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp, 125 159, (1982).

DOI: 10.1016/0149-1970(82)90020-8

Google Scholar

[19] J.W.H. Price, A discussion of the current procedures for design of welds against fatigue, Chapter 7, Weld cracking in ferrous alloys, Woodhead Publishing, 2009, DOI 10. 1533/9781845695453. 1. 127.

DOI: 10.1533/9781845695453.1.127

Google Scholar