Effects of Carbon Fibre Geogrid Reinforcement on Propagation of Cracking in Pavement and Augmentation of Flexible Pavement Life

Article Preview

Abstract:

Most of the distresses in flexible pavement are due to cracking and rutting. Geogrids distribute the street and loads to adequate area and cause augmentation bearing capacity. This project surveys the function of carbon and Glass fiber Geogrids on Delay of Crack propagation in flexible pavement and placement configuration in pavement structure. Four point bending loading applied to beams with dimension 50.8*63.5*381 mm and 6.5 mm tolerance (AASHTO TP8-96). According to the received specimen from cutting slabs of case study toward chart fatigue life, for each condition reinforced and unreinforced beams 3 sample in 4-strain level were experimented. Simulatedrepeated loading with a frequency 10 Hz simulate high-speed traffic was applied to beam fatigue specimen. Based on definition (AASHTO T321-07) assumed achieving to 50% first bending stiffness for end of the fatigue life indicate a significant reduction in the rate of crack propagation in reinforced samples with carbon geogrids compared to unreinforced ones, augmentation service life is up to 3.5fold and placing the geogrid at a one-third depth of overlay thickness from the bottom provide the maximum service life.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 891-892)

Pages:

1533-1538

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Shukla S.K., Yin J.H., and Kong,H., (2002) , Functions And Installation Of Paving Geosynthetics, Department Of Civil Engineering, Institute Of Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi – 221005, India.

DOI: 10.32381/jpm.2020.37.3-4.3

Google Scholar

[2] Chang, T.T., Ho, N.H., Chang, H, Y., and Yeh, H, S., (1999), Laboratory and Case Study for Geogrid Reinforced Flexible Pavement Overlay", TRB A2K07 Committee78, Annual Meeting.

DOI: 10.3141/1687-14

Google Scholar

[3] Brown S. F, (1999), Geosynthetics in Asphalt Pavements, International Geosynthetics.

Google Scholar

[4] Gerard, P.T. M, (1994), Geotextile and Geomemberance in Civil Engineering, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Brookfield.

Google Scholar

[5] Marienfeld. M.L. and Smiley, D., (1994), Paving Fabrics: The Why and the How-To, Geotechnical Fabrics Report, Pp. 24-29.

Google Scholar

[6] Koerner, R., 2005. Designing with Geosynthetic, fifth ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle, New Jersey.

Google Scholar

[7] Wasage, T.L.J., Ong, G.P., Fwa, T.F., Tan, S.A., 2004. Laboratory evaluation of rutting resistance of geosynthetics reinforced asphalt pavement. Journal of the Institution of Engineers Vol. 44 (2), 29–44.

Google Scholar

[8] Christopher, B. R, Berg, R, R, and Perkins, S.W. (2001). Geosynthetic Reinforcement in Roadway Sections, NCHRP Synthesis for NCHRP Project 20-7, Task 112: Final Report, 119p.

Google Scholar

[9] Brown, S.F., Thom, N.H., Sanders, P.J., 2001. A study of grid reinforced asphalt to combat reflection cracking. Journal of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists 70, 543–569.

Google Scholar

[10] Austin, R.A., Gilchrist, A.J.T., 1996. Enhanced performance of asphalt pavements using geocomposites. Geotextile and Geomembrane 14, 175–186.

DOI: 10.1016/0266-1144(96)00007-6

Google Scholar

[11] Komatsu, T., Kikuta, H., Tuji, Y., Muramatsu, E., 1998. Durability assessment of geogrid- reinforced asphalt concrete. Geotextile and Geomembrane 16, 257–271.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-1144(97)10011-5

Google Scholar

[12] Institute Of Transportation Studies, University Of California, Berkeley, (1996), Summary Report On Fatigue Response Of Asphalt Mixtures Project A-003A, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington. D. C.

Google Scholar

[13] Standard Test AASHTO Provisional Standards" Standard Test Method For Determination The Fatigue Life Of Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Subjected To Repeated Flexural Bending". TP321-07.

DOI: 10.1520/d7460

Google Scholar

[14] A. Virgili, F. Canestrari, A. Grilli, F.A. Santagata'Repeated load test on bituminous systems reinforced by geosynthetics', Geotextiles and Geomembranes 27 (2009) 187–195.

DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.11.004

Google Scholar

[15] Iran Highway Asphalt Paving Code, 2003. Ministry of Road and Transportation Research and Education Center, Iran. No. 234.

Google Scholar

[16] Asphalt Institute. Mix design methods for asphalt concrete and other hot-mix types, MS No. 2 (MS-2); 1984. p.22–5.

Google Scholar

[17] Standard Test AASHTO Provisional Standards" Standard Test Method For Determination The Fatigue Life Of Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Subjected To Repeated Flexural Bending". TP321-07.

DOI: 10.1520/d7460

Google Scholar

[18] Saraf C.L. Majidzadeh. K, and. William, (2001), Effect of Reinforcement on Fatigue Life of Asphalt Beams, Transportation Research Record, N 1534, Nov, 1996, P 66-71.

DOI: 10.3141/1534-10

Google Scholar