Standardized Test Method for Corrosion Pit-to-Fatigue Crack Transition for AA7075-T651 Aluminum Alloy

Abstract:

Corrosion damage (pit) is a stress raiser that can have deleterious effects on the fatigue life of airframe structural components. A better understanding and method for modeling the corrosion pit to fatigue crack transition would advance the fidelity of aircraft structural integrity estimates and fleet management decision making. Here, the focus is on developing a standardized fatigue test method for investigating the transition of a corrosion pit to fatigue crack in aluminum alloy AA 7075-T651 specimens. The standardized test method requires the development and validation of two sub-protocols (1) a pitting protocol to create a corrosion pit less than 200 μm diameter at the intersection of the central hole bore and planar surface of sheet and (2) a spot welding protocol for attaching the direct current potential drop (dcPD) probes on either side of the corrosion pit for fatigue crack growth measurement. A dcPD fatigue test method coupled with a unique 10-4-6 marker load sequence is used to measure the fatigue crack growth. The crack shape evolution and crack growth life are predicted using AFGROW.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 891-892)
• Pages: 205-210
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.891-892.205
• Online since: March 2014
• Authors: Divakar Mantha, Scott A. Fawaz*
• Keywords: Afgrow, Corrosion Pit, Crack Growth Rate, DCPD Method, Fatigue

References

[1] J. T. Burns, J. M. Larson, and R. P. Gangloff, Driving Forces for Localized Corrosion-to-Fatigue Crack Transition in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu, Fatigue & Fatigue of Engineering Materials and Structures 34 (2011) 745-773.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01568.x

[2] ASTM ASTM International (ASTM), 100 Barr Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959 E647, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM, (2000).

DOI: 10.1002/ep.670180104

[3] R. P. Gangloff, D. C. Slavik, R. S. Piascik R. H. Van Stone, Small-crack Test Methods, ASTM STP 1149, Eds. J. M. Larsen and J. E. Allison, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 1992, 116–168.

DOI: 10.1520/stp15067s

[4] D. A. Jones, Principles and Prevention of Corrosion, 2nd ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., (1996).

[5] USAFA-TR-2013-04, Pitting Protocol, Center for Aircraft Structural Life Extension (CAStLE), USAF Academy, CO 80840.

[6] USAFA-TR-2013-05, Spot Welding Protocol, Center for Aircraft Structural Life Extension (CAStLE), USAF Academy, CO 80840.

[7] S. Fawaz, Fatigue Crack Growth in Riveted Joints, Delft University, The Netherlands, (1997).

[8] J. K. Donald and J. Ruschau, Direct Current Potential Difference Fatigue Crack Measurement Technuqies, In Fatigue Crack Measurement: Techniques and Applications, Eds. K. J. Marsh, R. A. Smith, and R. O. Ritchie, Engineering Materials Advisory Service Ltd., Warley, UK, 1991, 11-37.

[9] G. M. Roe and L. F. Coffin, Unpublished Research, General Electric Corporate Research and Development, (1978).

[10] R. P. Gangloff, Electrical Potential Monitoring of Crack Formation and Subcritical Growth from Small Defects, Fatigue of Engineering Materials and Structures 4 (1981) 15-33.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1981.tb01372.x

[11] www. AFGROW. net version 5. 01. 06. 17 (May 2011).

[12] S. A. Fawaz, S. A. and B. Andersson, Accurate Stress Intensity Factor Solutions for Corner Cracks at a Hole., Engineering Fracture Mechanics 71 (2004) 1235-1254.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(03)00207-8