Fractographic Study on the Use of Rainflow Counting for Small and Long Cracks in AA7050

Article Preview

Abstract:

Using a da/dN equation to predict fatigue crack growth for a variable amplitude loading sequence, requires converting the sequence into an equivalent series of constant amplitude cycles, which is sometimes achieved using the rainflow cycle counting technique. Rainflow counting views small intermediate cycles as an interruption to a larger cycle, in effect, the crack tip remembers the state of the larger cycle. This has been shown to be an effective technique in predicting fatigue growth rates for long cracks, but has not been extensively investigated for use in predicting the growth of small cracks. An investigation was made into the applicability of rainflow cycle counting for predicting the crack growth of small and long cracks created with variable amplitude fatigue loading in AA7050-T7451 plate, a common modern aircraft material. A series of coupons were tested with a number of different variable amplitude loading sequences which had distinct marker bands inserted to separate the individual segments of loading and enable them to be identified fractographically. For the sequences examined, which covered varying numbers of interrupted cycles and a staircase of three steps, the baseline and the rainflow loading segments within each sequence showed effectively the same rate of growth for the same stress intensity range in both the small and long crack coupons, demonstrating that rainflow cycle counting was a suitable cycle counting technique for both small and long cracks.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 891-892)

Pages:

687-692

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Matsuishi, T. Endo, Fatigue of metals subjected to varying stress-fatigue lives under random loading, Preliminary Proceedings of the Chugoku-Shikoku District Meeting, The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (1968) 3740.

Google Scholar

[2] T. Endo, K. Mitsunaga, K. Takahasi, K. Kobayashi, M. Matsuishi, Damage evaluation of metals for random or varying loading, Proceedings of the 1974 Symposium on Mechanical Behaviour of Materials (1974) 371–380.

Google Scholar

[3] N. Dowling, Fatigue failure predictions for complicated stress-strain histories, J. of Mat. (1972) 71–87.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Downing, D. Socie, Simple rainflow counting algorithms, Int J of Fatigue (1982) 31–40.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-1123(82)90018-4

Google Scholar

[5] ASTM, Standard Practices for Cycle Counting in Fatigue Analysis, E1049 – 85, (2005).

Google Scholar

[6] Y. -L. Lee, T. Tjhung, Rainflow cycle counting techniques, in: Metal Fatigue Analysis Handbook, Elsevier Inc., (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-385204-5.00003-3

Google Scholar

[7] G. Glinka, J. Kam, Rainflow counting algorithm for very long stress histories, Int. J Fat. (1987) 223–8.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-1123(87)90025-9

Google Scholar

[8] J.B. de Jonge, The monitoring of fatigue loads, Proceed. of the ICAS Congress in Rome (1970).

Google Scholar

[9] C. Amzallag, J. Grey, J. R.J. Bahaud, Standardization of the rainflow counting method for fatigue analysis, International Journal of Fatigue (1994) 287–293.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-1123(94)90343-3

Google Scholar

[10] R. Sunder, Engineering analysis of notch root fatigue crack growth under spectrum loading, Internatioanl Journal of Fatigue (1991) 249–262.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-1123(91)90249-x

Google Scholar

[11] A.K. Khosrovaneh, N.E. Dowling, Fatigue loading history reconstruction based on the rainflow technique, Internatioanl Journal of Fatigue (1990) 99–106.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-1123(90)90679-9

Google Scholar

[12] R. Sunder, S.A. Seetharam, T.A. Bhaskaran, Cycle counting for fatigue crack growth analysis, International Journal of Fatigue (1984) 147–156.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-1123(84)90032-x

Google Scholar

[13] M. Krkoska, P. White, S. Barter, R. Alderliesten, R. Benedictus, Fatigue crack paths in AA2024-T3 alloy when loaded with constant amplitude and simple underloads spectra, Eng Fract Mech (2010) 1857–65.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.030

Google Scholar

[14] P. White, S. Barter, C. Wright, Small crack growth rates from simple sequences containing underloads in AA7050-T7451, International Journal of Fatigue (2009) 1865–1874.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.014

Google Scholar

[15] S. Lynch, Progression markings, striations, and crack-arrest markings on fracture surfaces, Materials Science and Engineering A 74-80 (2007) 468–470.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.09.083

Google Scholar

[16] J.A. Harter, AFGROW Users Guide and Technical Manual, Wright-Patterson AFB, AFRL, (2006).

Google Scholar

[17] M. Burchill, S. Barter, E. Amsterdam, Improved fatigue life predictions for combat aircraft fatigue life from a novel testing program, 15th Australian International Aerospace Congress, (2012).

Google Scholar

[18] J. Schubbe, Fatigue crack propagation in 7050-T7451 plate alloy, Engineering Fracture Mechanics (2009) 1037–1048.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.01.006

Google Scholar

[19] K. Walker, The effect of stress ratio during crack propagation and fatigue for 2024-T3 and 7075-T6 aluminum, ASTM Special Technical Publication 462, ASTM, (1970).

DOI: 10.1520/stp32032s

Google Scholar