F-35 Full Scale Durability Modeling and Test

Abstract:

The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program includes three aircraft variants, one of which has been designed and built according to US Air Force requirements, and the other two of which have been designed and built according to US Navy requirements. For all three variants, a system design and development (SDD) configuration aircraft is being subjected to a full-scale durability (FSD) test. In each case, the complete airframe is being subjected to two lifetimes of severe design spectrum loading, with maneuver, catapults/arrestments (carrier variant only) and buffet loads applied as separate, alternating 1000 flight hour blocks during the major test sequence. For the airframe tests, the buffet loads are applied quasi-statically; for the separate vertical tail component tests, they are applied dynamically. In addition, tests of doors and attachments (local tests) are conducted when the full airframe test is down for inspections (as required, for example, between the first and second lifetimes). In this paper, we describe the manner in which the airframe tests were designed, including fatigue spectrum development and test adequacy analyses. In addition, we provide a summary of the test findings to date, along with a description of the analytical simulation for a typical finding. The paper includes an analysis vs test correlation summary that provides an indication of the validity of the fatigue crack initiation (FCI) and fatigue crack growth (FCG) analysis methods used to design the aircraft.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 891-892)
• Pages: 693-701
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.891-892.693
• Online since: March 2014
• Authors: Dale L. Ball*, Philip C. Gross, Robert J. Burt
• Keywords: Fatigue Crack Growth (FCG), Fatigue Crack Initiation, Full-Scale Durability Test

References

[1] Joint Service Specification Guide, Aircraft Structures, JSSG-(2006).

[2] Ball, D.L., Norwood, D.S. and TerMaath, S.C., Joint Strike Fighter Airframe Durability and Damage Tolerance Certification, 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, May (2006).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-1867

[3] MIL-STD-1530C (USAF), Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP), Department of Defense Standard Practice, 1 November, (2005).

[4] Ball, D.L., Examination of Durability and Damage Tolerance Design Criteria, USAF Aircraft Structural Integrity Program Conference, Nov. (2012).

[5] Limer, T.S., Ishee, D.M., Hamilton, J.L., Black, H.W., Ball, D.L., An Advanced Software System for the Comprehensive Implementation of Durability and Damage Tolerance Requirements in the Design of New Aircraft Structure, Fatigue 2006 - The 9th International Fatigue Congress, Atlanta, GA, USA, 16 May, (2006).

[6] Porter, P. G. and Liu, A. F., A Rapid Method to Predict Fatigue Crack Initiation, NADC-8010-60, Naval Air Development Center, Warminster, PA, February (1983).

[7] Morrow, J., Martin, J.F., and Dowling, N.E., Local Stress-Strain Approach to Cumulative Fatigue Damage Analysis – Final Report, T. &A.M. Report No. 379, (1974).

[8] Neuber, H., Theory of Stress Concentration for Shear Strain Prismatical Bodies with Arbitrary Nonlinear Stress-Strain Law, Journal of Applied Mechanics, Trans., ASME, Series E, December (1961).

DOI: 10.1115/1.3641780

[9] Nihei, M., Heuler, P., Boller, C. and Seeger, T., Evaluation of Mean Stress Effect on Fatigue Life by Use of Damage Parameters, Intl. J. Fatigue, Vol. 8, 1986, p.119.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-1123(86)90002-2

[10] Gallagher, J.P., Giessler, F.J., Berens, A.P. and Engle, R.M. Jr., USAF Damage Tolerant Design Handbook, AFWAL-TR-82-3073, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Labs, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, May (1984).

[11] Gallagher, J.P. and Hughes, T.F., Influence of Yield Strength on Overload Affected Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior in 4340 Steel, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, AFFDL-TR-74-27, July (1974).

DOI: 10.21236/ad0787655

[12] Christian, M.E., Overview of the CTOL and STOVL Full Scale Static Tests on F-35 Lightning II Program, USAF Aircraft Structural Integrity Program Conference, Dec. (2009).

[13] Yates, J.B., Durability Testing of the STOVL F-35 Lightning II, USAF Aircraft Structural Integrity Program Conference, Nov. (2011).

[14] Christian, M.E., Overview of the Full Scale Durability Tests on F-35 Lightning II Program, USAF Aircraft Structural Integrity Program Conference, Dec. (2012).

[15] Ball, D.L., Fatigue Stress Spectrum Generation Program, SPCGEN v2. 3, FZM-9779, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co. (2009).

[16] Manders, C., CTOL Spectrum Generation Report, 2ZGP01306, RevC., Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co. (2010).

[17] Needler, S.D., CO-53 Truncation Verification Test Program, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co., (2010).

[18] Yates, J.B., Comparison of F-35 and Legacy FSD Test Finding Rates, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co., (2013).